From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12054: 24.1; regression? font-lock no-break-space with nil nobreak-char-display Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 13:02:23 -0700 Message-ID: <008212816D764555A4B1B60717406C05@us.oracle.com> References: <87mwyzyn76.fsf@gnu.org><45DEAA69BC6E4630BA8DA0B07A0ECE92@us.oracle.com><83vcdm4oby.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1351972996 16352 80.91.229.3 (3 Nov 2012 20:03:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 20:03:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@gnu.org, 12054@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'Stefan Monnier'" , "'Eli Zaretskii'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 03 21:03:24 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TUjw8-0005GZ-1c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 21:03:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48470 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUjvy-0006zo-An for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:03:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54738) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUjvv-0006zc-ID for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:03:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUjvu-0000dM-Fi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:03:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37314) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUjvu-0000dI-CL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:03:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TUjyj-00035j-Ov for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:06:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 20:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12054 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12054-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12054.135197313811853 (code B ref 12054); Sat, 03 Nov 2012 20:06:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12054) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2012 20:05:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47565 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TUjyL-000357-Hx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:05:38 -0400 Original-Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:45497) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TUjyI-000350-FJ for 12054@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:05:36 -0400 Original-Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id qA3K2aLe032175 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 3 Nov 2012 20:02:37 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt356.oracle.com (acsmt356.oracle.com [141.146.40.156]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qA3K2aYD018763 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 3 Nov 2012 20:02:36 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt108.oracle.com (abhmt108.oracle.com [141.146.116.60]) by acsmt356.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id qA3K2ZZS028356; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 15:02:35 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.185.65) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 13:02:35 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-reply-to: Thread-Index: Ac25/Hk05w9oueY/TzCgA69OEzZJIQAAMRZw X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:66408 Archived-At: > >> Why should a character-alternative expression care whether the > >> representation is unibyte or multibyte? Isn't that a bug? > > There are many different ways to interpret this, and I can > give you one where the behavior is explained without paying > attention to multibyte/unibyte differences. > > \240 in your string means "the byte with octal number 0240". OK, so then do you think this should DTRT? (font-lock-add-keywords nil '(("\\(\302\240\\)+" (0 'foo t))) 'APPEND) I'm guessing it shouldn't, because IIUC the buffer in fact contains only the single raw byte \240 and not the multibyte sequence of two raw bytes \302 and \240. But I barely understand this stuff at all; I mostly misunderstand it still.