From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Reitter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 23 development policy (was: Syncing Gnus and Emacs repositories) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:25:43 +0100 Message-ID: <0056AD1B-15E6-453B-8F4D-F18AF07EC97C@gmail.com> References: <6sps3z32ap.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87tztbcue9.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181805952 12863 80.91.229.12 (14 Jun 2007 07:25:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:25:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Adrian Robert To: emacs- devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 14 09:25:51 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HyjiI-0006bS-Cq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:25:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HyjiG-00083S-7b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:25:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HyjiD-000831-7X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:25:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HyjiB-00082Y-O1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:25:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HyjiB-00081g-KN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:25:43 -0400 Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hyji9-00057T-M0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:25:42 -0400 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 34so662675ugf for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:25:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=jO3STWJq/OhiEGADSmlra9d2CIn/NNqNKdi5pgAiUy+74EcHmZSX4POAPfBtyaPESseBNeJa5Lz0IXnbN5uPvwiIlmU6N1aRUSaN1OI8AN/Awk0ZTXi6iiXvkl2LD48RoUJWAwbccSvR395aRGYPERp8dAnVjwykN9yq71ERGkc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=k9533aF8I22rFWT05BBBsHyh2BsswOUKqU/ffBDkDFnJ3ZjiyI25zYYRaIQ318YQuVL0rLQFw1pp9qCHudeERD3fAMrBozF0w+zCkYWlEm2b8HkVyxk3rOmfubx/A+zvzWjm6hYLCycnAkbWckOveBEjkX67TIM071QDKZ+vxYo= Original-Received: by 10.82.111.8 with SMTP id j8mr2781328buc.1181805939457; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:25:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?10.5.5.200? ( [84.9.229.162]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 35sm3079853nfu.2007.06.14.00.25.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:25:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:72835 Archived-At: On 14 Jun 2007, at 07:31, Reiner Steib wrote: > I'd suppose that several developers have uncomitted changes lying > around since the kind-of feature freeze in May 2004. If we take "very > limited" literally, such changes might have to wait some more years. There is the OpenStep/Cocoa port (Emacs.app) which was meant to be included. The interaction with the other code should be limited. This port has been in development for a few years now, and it would probably benefit from the additional input from other developers once it is in the CVS (perhaps in the unicode branch to start).