From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: RE: Is there any elisp functions to tell whether the cursor is in a comment block? Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:53:20 -0700 Message-ID: <003501c8e6cd$94a6e970$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> References: <87tzetis7w.fsf@DEBLAP1.BeNet> <71bcf427-442c-45b8-95d6-5f8289c85297@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <87iqv8sdyi.fsf@DEBLAP1.BeNet> <87mykk1b1r.fsf@DEBLAP1.BeNet><487BDF2F.8010202@gmail.com> <487C526A.6010806@gmail.com> <003201c8e685$3d7f9770$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <487D0D8B.7050907@gmail.com> <001c01c8e6c0$bd3203a0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <487D17E3.3020803@gmail.com> <002601c8e6c7$077ad530$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <487D226E.7040207@gmail.com> <003401c8e6ca$bbee0660$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <487D28FD.1060009@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1216162481 21815 80.91.229.12 (15 Jul 2008 22:54:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:54:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'Tom Tromey' , help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: "'Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)'" Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 16 00:55:29 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KItQb-0006BV-VM for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:55:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42578 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KItPj-0004ol-Qt for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:54:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KItPP-0004n2-4z for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:54:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KItPL-0004lI-TX for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:54:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59081 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KItPL-0004lD-L8 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:54:07 -0400 Original-Received: from rgminet01.oracle.com ([148.87.113.118]:60166) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KItPL-00044m-KG for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:54:07 -0400 Original-Received: from rgmgw2.us.oracle.com (rgmgw2.us.oracle.com [138.1.186.111]) by rgminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.6) with ESMTP id m6FMs3Sk002855; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:54:03 -0600 Original-Received: from acsmt350.oracle.com (acsmt350.oracle.com [141.146.40.150]) by rgmgw2.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.2.4) with ESMTP id m6FCUdk6028311; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:54:02 -0600 Original-Received: from inet-141-146-46-1.oracle.com by acsmt351.oracle.com with ESMTP id 3709145851216162395; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:53:15 -0700 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/141.144.75.28) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:53:15 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <487D28FD.1060009@gmail.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Thread-Index: AcjmzOwq0FZBHB6kTjSQ/ndQaXqMQAAAEdIw X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:55617 Archived-At: > Well, the automatic procedure could instead produce a wiki > page with the compatibility information. Would that be good? Dunno. When info is created automatically, there is a risk that it be wrong. When info is duplicated outside the source file, there is a risk that it be different (not up-to-date). I don't really have more to say about this.