From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: RE: Is there any elisp functions to tell whether the cursor is in a comment block? Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:32:58 -0700 Message-ID: <003401c8e6ca$bbee0660$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> References: <87tzetis7w.fsf@DEBLAP1.BeNet> <71bcf427-442c-45b8-95d6-5f8289c85297@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <87iqv8sdyi.fsf@DEBLAP1.BeNet> <87mykk1b1r.fsf@DEBLAP1.BeNet><487BDF2F.8010202@gmail.com> <487C526A.6010806@gmail.com> <003201c8e685$3d7f9770$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <487D0D8B.7050907@gmail.com> <001c01c8e6c0$bd3203a0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <487D17E3.3020803@gmail.com> <002601c8e6c7$077ad530$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <487D226E.7040207@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1216161261 18492 80.91.229.12 (15 Jul 2008 22:34:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:34:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'Tom Tromey' , help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: "'Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)'" Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 16 00:35:09 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KIt6x-0000IE-UR for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:35:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47576 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KIt65-0004IJ-Jb for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:34:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KIt5k-0004Hp-Cb for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:33:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KIt5i-0004Gx-Jp for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:33:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57231 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KIt5i-0004Gq-Dj for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:33:50 -0400 Original-Received: from agminet01.oracle.com ([141.146.126.228]:41523) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KIt5i-0001Jj-7H for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:33:50 -0400 Original-Received: from rgmgw1.us.oracle.com (rgmgw1.us.oracle.com [138.1.186.110]) by agminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id m6FMXj5X024633; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:33:45 -0500 Original-Received: from acsmt350.oracle.com (acsmt350.oracle.com [141.146.40.150]) by rgmgw1.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.2.4) with ESMTP id m6F2ka8j007073; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:33:45 -0600 Original-Received: from inet-141-146-46-1.oracle.com by acsmt351.oracle.com with ESMTP id 3709140871216161173; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:32:53 -0700 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/141.144.75.28) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:32:52 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <487D226E.7040207@gmail.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Thread-Index: AcjmyPxAbRhiKEX3QiuU59Iy7XYPJAAAMGYg X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:55614 Archived-At: > >> I would also suggest adding this information to all elisp files on > >> EmacsWiki. Perhaps this can be done automatically > > > > I would advise against trying to guess compatibility like > > that. Let library authors determine and specify the compatibilities > > explicitly. Else assume nothing. > > I have asked for that before, but nothing happened. That > means that the burden is now on the users. > Maybe something like this can be used then: > > 1) Announce that an automatic change as above will be made unless > package authors (or someone else) adds the Compatible label. > 2) Do the automatic change after some weeks. This is a discussion for Emacs Wiki, not here. Personally, I disagree with any automatic messing with source code contributed to the wiki. Please leave the source code as its contributors wrote it. Anyway, if a tool can automatically massage source code to produce input for another tool, then the second tool can do its own automatic massaging. IOW, do this on the fly, if you must do it, but leave the contributed source code alone.