From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#742: tool-bar and diary on XP Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:04:14 -0700 Message-ID: <002501c9091f$55acbd70$c2b22382@us.oracle.com> References: <386604.11228.qm@web58611.mail.re3.yahoo.com><18604.43973.133303.235265@fencepost.gnu.org><007001c9039f$be4fbd30$c2b22382@us.oracle.com> <001401c90865$f42d7a30$c2b22382@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: Drew Adams , 742@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1219937290 9910 80.91.229.12 (28 Aug 2008 15:28:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:28:10 +0000 (UTC) To: <742@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>, "'Glenn Morris'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 28 17:29:04 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KYjQX-0003Gj-4a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:28:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45555 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KYjPY-0004bb-Ew for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:27:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KYjPR-0004Wu-Ni for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:27:41 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KYjPP-0004V0-UC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:27:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37633 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KYjPP-0004Uk-M6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:27:39 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:56708) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KYjPP-0004nL-DB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:27:39 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m7SFRTQt001460; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:27:30 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m7SFA65F027880; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:10:06 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs , don@donarmstrong.com Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:10:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 742 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs,calendar,w32 X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 742-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B742.121993585925283 (code B ref 742); Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:10:05 +0000 Original-Received: (at 742) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 28 Aug 2008 15:04:19 +0000 Original-Received: from agminet01.oracle.com (agminet01.oracle.com [141.146.126.228]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m7SF4FK7025181 for <742@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:04:16 -0700 Original-Received: from rgmgw1.us.oracle.com (rgmgw1.us.oracle.com [138.1.186.110]) by agminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id m7SF48Ks003314; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:04:09 -0500 Original-Received: from acsmt701.oracle.com (acsmt701.oracle.com [141.146.40.71]) by rgmgw1.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.2.4) with ESMTP id m7SF48Gd021477; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:04:08 -0600 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.194) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:04:07 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <001401c90865$f42d7a30$c2b22382@us.oracle.com> thread-index: AckDIr4bRqfZcNt0Syac3Mgi1lT2TAAfL9hwATGNLfAALj6OkA== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:27:40 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:19801 Archived-At: > From: Drew Adams Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 9:57 AM > FYI - The tool-bar problems I saw with Emacs 23 appear to be > fixed in the pretest (Emacs 22.2.91). HTH and Thx. > > > From: Drew Adams Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 8:08 AM > > I haven't followed this, and I don't have time to look into > > it further, but just in case it helps a bit: > > > > I too have problems with the tool bar on Windows in Emacs 23 > > - have ever since 23 started. Tool bars keep showing up even > > though I have tool bars turned off. > > > > > Information received off-list (see below) suggests this is > > > Windows-specific. I don't use Windows - can any Windows > > > users help? It sounds like some redisplay thing... > > > > > > Bostjan Vilfan wrote (on Wed, 20 Aug 2008 at 15:13 -0700): > > > > > > > 1. I investigated the problem in the same version of > Emacs running > > > > under VMware Workstation and Suse Linux 11.0. In that > case you are > > > > right, the problem does not exist. > > > > > > > > 2. However, under Windows XP it definitely does exist > (at least on > > > > my machine). Re your question, I tried a different, very simple > > > > diary file, and obtained the same result. To this I must add an > > > > observation that I made by accident: If the tool bar is > disabled as > > > > described previously and the Emacs window is covered > with another > > > > window, the tool bar becomes active once again after the Emacs > > > > window is uncovered! Sorry, I was confused. I was thinking this was an Emacs 23 pretest. The problem still exists in Emacs 23. :-(