From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#117: bug 117: messed up frame parameters Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:04:12 -0700 Message-ID: <002401c9091f$55038520$c2b22382@us.oracle.com> References: <003101c8e10b$b1c77d70$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com><4873D420.4070303@gnu.org> <000a01c8e1d8$5dbe5780$c2b22382@us.oracle.com><001401c8f4df$685def10$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com><4894CC90.5070404@gnu.org><001401c8f4ec$471448b0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <000c01c90863$b952b6c0$c2b22382@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: Drew Adams , 117@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1219937307 9981 80.91.229.12 (28 Aug 2008 15:28:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:28:27 +0000 (UTC) To: <117@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>, "'Jason Rumney'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 28 17:29:11 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KYjQf-0003KW-NV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:28:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45636 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KYjPh-0004kM-9d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:27:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KYjPS-0004Xu-Tv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:27:42 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KYjPS-0004X8-11 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:27:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37634 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KYjPR-0004Wv-Om for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:27:41 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:56709) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KYjPR-0004oN-FX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:27:41 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m7SFRTQv001460; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:27:30 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m7SFA4ta027805; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:10:04 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs , don@donarmstrong.com Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:10:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 117 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 117-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B117.121993585725230 (code B ref 117); Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:10:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 117) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 28 Aug 2008 15:04:17 +0000 Original-Received: from agminet01.oracle.com (agminet01.oracle.com [141.146.126.228]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m7SF4E1n025180 for <117@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:04:15 -0700 Original-Received: from agmgw2.us.oracle.com (agmgw2.us.oracle.com [152.68.180.213]) by agminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id m7SF47gx003285; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:04:07 -0500 Original-Received: from acsmt701.oracle.com (acsmt701.oracle.com [141.146.40.71]) by agmgw2.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.0/Switch-3.2.0) with ESMTP id m7SF46pw003756; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:04:07 -0600 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.194) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:04:06 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <000c01c90863$b952b6c0$c2b22382@us.oracle.com> thread-index: Acj06bFY7m83DeGESNCPvJuYrLUiCgAAc76QBN3fpzAALwlfgA== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:27:42 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:19803 Archived-At: > From: Drew Adams Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 9:41 AM > > From: Drew Adams Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2008 3:08 PM > > > > [Also, I still see the problem that a frame's text will > > > > often become blanked out partially or completely and remain > > > > that way. I must select the frame and do `C-l' to get the > > > > text back. I assume that this is a general problem that has > > > > already been reported.] > > > > > > A bad assumption. You appear to be the only one with this problem. > > > > Oh, well, in that case the recipe is the same as for bug #117. > > > > You're right that I don't see the problem with just emacs -Q > > (there is only a tiny delay before a frame gets repainted, > > if you move another frame over part of > > it temporarily etc). > > > > What I see with oneonone.el is that a frame can remain > > forever blanked out, until I go to it and do C-l. The blank > > part can be from from other window mgr window having covered > > part of the frame. But I think it can also happen without > > having been covered by another w-m window. If you try the > > recipe I sent, you will soon enough see the problem. It might > > also happen more if there are more > > apps open (not sure) - e.g. multiple copies of Emacs. > > In the pretest (22.2.90), all of the symptoms I reported > previously (multiple > frame parameters, display problems) for this bug seem to have > been taken care > of. > > Thanks very much. Dunno if this bug report helped at all, but > anyway, thanks. Sorry, I was confused. I was thinking this was an Emacs 23 pretest. These problems still exist in Emacs 23. :-(