From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: Why @#! is not Emacs using the Recycle bin on w32? Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:28:31 -0700 Message-ID: <001401c909f4$47166510$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> References: <48B7288E.3040503@gmail.com> <48B7AC10.6090800@gmail.com> <48B7B08B.6050103@gmail.com> <48B7F905.7060605@gmail.com> <001301c909e8$d63092e0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220027360 9942 80.91.229.12 (29 Aug 2008 16:29:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'David House' , 'Eli Zaretskii' , jasonr@gnu.org, "'Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)'" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "'Juanma Barranquero'" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 29 18:30:13 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KZ6rO-0007al-4S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:30:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57485 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZ6qP-00041t-90 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:29:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZ6qK-00041b-OC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:29:00 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZ6qJ-000419-8s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:29:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55540 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZ6qJ-000416-1O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:28:59 -0400 Original-Received: from rgminet01.oracle.com ([148.87.113.118]:63508) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KZ6q9-0004e9-ED; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:28:50 -0400 Original-Received: from agmgw2.us.oracle.com (agmgw2.us.oracle.com [152.68.180.213]) by rgminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.6) with ESMTP id m7TGSdUH002243; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:28:39 -0600 Original-Received: from acsmt707.oracle.com (acsmt707.oracle.com [141.146.40.85]) by agmgw2.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.0/Switch-3.2.0) with ESMTP id m7TGSWTO003364; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:28:38 -0600 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/69.181.100.12) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:28:31 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AckJ6a9Pe0UsIyFFQYqDTttqZUHPDAACOgng X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:103185 Archived-At: > > [BTW - I am astounded that Lennart, who is no newbie, just > > discovered the default behavior and doesn't use Dired much. > > I can't imagine using Emacs without Dired. Perhaps it's > > related to using Viper?] Juanma> FWIW, I've been using Emacs for about eleven years Juanma> (not much, by this standards, but still, no newbie) Juanma> and I rarely use Dired. (I never use Viper.) Most Juanma> file management operations I do from a shell (using the Juanma> proprietary 4NT, now TCC). Alan> Hah! I don't use dired at all (except by accident, Alan> when I curse for having to type C-x k to get rid of it). Alan> I do file manipulation in a bash session on a different Alan> virtual terminal. Ah, yes. If you work in a shell buffer much of the time, that's understandable. And I didn't mean to imply that someone who doesn't use Dired much is somehow not using Emacs correctly. I would be surprised though if most Emacs users don't use Dired much. I mainly meant that I was surprised that Lennart was unaware of the default deletion behavior. Nothing important intended by my "BTW".