From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Cindy N. Gibson" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help,gmane.spam.detected Subject: Re: Sofya Pavlovna, blinking with Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:24:15 -0600 Message-ID: <000301c4e2e4$0edc5c80$24bf3bc9@odagqj> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1255; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1103146846 30918 80.91.229.6 (15 Dec 2004 21:40:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:40:46 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 15 22:40:36 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cegsu-0006LU-00 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 22:40:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Ceh37-0001zP-LP for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:51:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Ceh2W-0001nF-BL for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:50:32 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Ceh2R-0001mS-Pg for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:50:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Ceh2N-0001gt-9R for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:50:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cegrn-0004G7-AP for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:39:27 -0500 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cegna-000502-S0 for gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:35:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1Cegrm-0004FW-2U for gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:39:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.41.5] (helo=mx20.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1Cegrj-00048a-Lc; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:39:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [69.192.64.229] (helo=cpe0004acdd4e22-cm001225708052.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) by mx20.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cegre-0001Q4-TB; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:39:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org by cpe0004acdd4e22-cm001225708052.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #5); Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:24:20 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.rog.mail.yahoo.com by cpe0004acdd4e22-cm001225708052.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com with SMTP id 4457741; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:23:38 -0600 Original-To: "W. Prather" X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-Spam-Report: 29.4 points; * 0.0 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO * 5.4 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100% * [score: 1.0000] * 2.0 RCVD_IN_DSBL RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org * [] * 5.0 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net * [Blocked - see ] * 4.0 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL * [69.192.64.229 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org] * 4.0 URIBL_SBL Contains a URL listed in the SBL blocklist * [URIs: oflist.com] * 4.0 URIBL_BE_SURBL Contains a URL listed in the BE SURBL blocklist * [URIs: oflist.com] * 4.0 URIBL_SC_SURBL Contains a URL listed in the SC SURBL blocklist * [URIs: oflist.com] * 1.0 MSGID_DOLLARS Message-Id has pattern used in spam Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:22798 gmane.spam.detected:422092 X-Report-Unspam: http://unspam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:22798 Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:24:20 -0600 We reviewed our records and you were a p proved with 3.2 /% Unfortunatelly, we were not able to contact you by phone. Please enter all information more correctly again and we will process your paperwork ASAP. http://www.oflist.com/ Thank you. Cindy N. Gibson - Customer Support 264