* stacked diacritics in version 23
@ 2009-09-17 13:15 B. T. Raven
2009-09-17 14:48 ` Teemu Likonen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: B. T. Raven @ 2009-09-17 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw
To: help-gnu-emacs
Is it possible with the new version to stack diacritics using both
composed and uncomposed glyphs? What is the limit on the number of
diacritics? Will they overlap descenders of the preceding line of text?
Ed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: stacked diacritics in version 23
2009-09-17 13:15 stacked diacritics in version 23 B. T. Raven
@ 2009-09-17 14:48 ` Teemu Likonen
2009-09-17 17:21 ` B. T. Raven
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Teemu Likonen @ 2009-09-17 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: help-gnu-emacs
On 2009-09-17 08:15 (-0500), B. T. Raven wrote:
> Is it possible with the new version to stack diacritics using both
> composed and uncomposed glyphs? What is the limit on the number of
> diacritics? Will they overlap descenders of the preceding line of
> text?
I’m not quite sure what you mean but I got this from my Finnish
keyboard:
previous line
ụ̧̨̄̈̂̃́̀̌̆̊̉̋̈̄̇
next line
It’s U+1E7B LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH MACRON AND DIAERESIS with added
combining diacritical marks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: stacked diacritics in version 23
2009-09-17 14:48 ` Teemu Likonen
@ 2009-09-17 17:21 ` B. T. Raven
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: B. T. Raven @ 2009-09-17 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw
To: help-gnu-emacs
Teemu Likonen wrote:
> On 2009-09-17 08:15 (-0500), B. T. Raven wrote:
>
>> Is it possible with the new version to stack diacritics using both
>> composed and uncomposed glyphs? What is the limit on the number of
>> diacritics? Will they overlap descenders of the preceding line of
>> text?
>
> I’m not quite sure what you mean but I got this from my Finnish
> keyboard:
>
> previous line
> ụ̧̨̄̈̂̃́̀̌̆̊̉̋̈̄̇
> next line
>
> It’s U+1E7B LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH MACRON AND DIAERESIS with added
> combining diacritical marks.
I don't see this correctly on Thunderbird where they are all jammed
together (non-monospace font). In this reply window they are strung out
starting with the macroned umlauted u.
I wanted to be able (using an appropriate input method) to type an ascii
-range character and then something between U+0300 and U+036f to be
stacked (lower to higher on top, and higher to lower on bottom) above
(below) the base glyph.
Some examples:
̡̢̧̨̛̖̗̘̙̜̝̞̟̠̣̤̥̦̩̪̫̬̭̮̯̀́̂̃̄̅̆̇̈̉̊̋̌̍̎̏̐̑̒̓̔̕̚
Looked at in Emacs 23 these are all strung out horizontally. When I
copy-past from there into Thunderbird, some are displayed on top of each
other. It may be that Emacs ver. 23 w32 build doesn't really do these
uncomposed diacriticals yet, or maybe I just need to know about another
input method.
Thanks anyway,
Ed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-17 17:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-09-17 13:15 stacked diacritics in version 23 B. T. Raven
2009-09-17 14:48 ` Teemu Likonen
2009-09-17 17:21 ` B. T. Raven
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.