Re: Too many permutations computed

[Heime <heimeborgia@protonmail.com>]

Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

------- Original Message -------
On Friday, August 4th, 2023 at 4:08 AM, Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org> wrote:


> uzibalqa wrote:
> 
> > > (while (< j h) [...]
> > > (setq j (1+ j)))
> > > [...]
> > > for i := 0; i < k-1; i += 1 do [...]
> > 
> > Do you understand what the i += 1 does ? It is the same as
> > i++, am I right ? The difference lies in the timing of when
> > the increment takes place (immediately in the case of i +=
> > 1, and after the value is used in the case of i++). Do you
> > think the distinction mentioned makes a difference for the
> > algorithm ?
> 
> 
> It is up to the designer of the pseudo code to decide if it
> works like that, if it does then it would make
> a difference, yes.
> 
> See if you can write the Elisp as close as possible to the
> pseudo code, including the variable names:
> 
> (cl-loop for i from 0 to ... )
 
Yes, I have got working properly with the cl-loop change.