From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ido Magal Subject: Re: Org-toggle-checkbox broken in 7.5? Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:11:17 -0700 Message-ID: <-925924472488590738@unknownmsgid> References: <3DC4AE9DA481CC4DAED5422B18C4CE45027B06C9@sogorex01.ad.sogeti.se> <4375.1307814644@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <3DC4AE9DA481CC4DAED5422B18C4CE45027B086C@sogorex01.ad.sogeti.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8J2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41031) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWAfh-000132-5p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:11:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWAff-0007bc-Bh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:11:29 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169]:55260) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWAfe-0007bW-TN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:11:27 -0400 Received: by yxp4 with SMTP id 4so480795yxp.0 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:11:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3DC4AE9DA481CC4DAED5422B18C4CE45027B086C@sogorex01.ad.sogeti.se> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Please report back when you identify the issue. I regularly get latest org and have never gotten org-toggle-checkbox to do anything. On Jun 13, 2011, at 6:05, "Wikstr=C3=B6m, Gustav" wrote: > Good comments! > > I did some tests beforehand but did not try the minimal .emacs. > > The key is still bound to the function according to C-h c and M-x org-tog= gle-checkbox did not do any difference. There is something blocking the fun= ction in my initialization though, because when using a minimal init.el it = did work! Since it's probably a local error springing from something altere= d by me I'll continue with the debugging on my own. > > Thanks for the input. > > /Gustav > > -----Original Message----- > From: nick@dokosmarshall.org [mailto:nick@dokosmarshall.org] On Behalf Of= Nick Dokos > Sent: den 11 juni 2011 19:51 > To: Wikstr=C3=B6m, Gustav > Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; nicholas.dokos@hp.com > Subject: Re: [O] Org-toggle-checkbox broken in 7.5? > > Wikstr=C3=B6m, Gustav wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> The command C-c C-x C-b has stopped working for me and I quietly blame 7= .5 for it. Anyone who can >> attest or reject this statement? >> > > Works here: Org-mode version 7.5 (baseline.273.g889a48) > > Before blaming org, please do your due diligence: > > Execute the function by hand, with M-x org-toggle-checkbox RET, and > *report the results*: "it does not work" is just not specific enough, > because it depends on your expectations which may or may not match > reality. If it does nothing, then say so explicitly. > > Is the key still bound to the correct function? C-h c C-c C-x C-b will > tell you whether the key is still bound to what it is supposed to be > bound to (org-toggle-checkbox in this case). If not, then you are > probably using some minor mode that hijacks the key. Check the mode > line for what minor modes you are running, eliminate them one by one and > see if you can get the functionality back. > > If this doesn't resolve it, next start up emacs without your > customizations, just a minimal .emacs file that initializes org-mode, > visit the file and do the things above again. I keep a very short > minimal.emacs file for exactly this purpose, start up emacs with > > emacs -q -l ~/minimal.emacs > > and try to reproduce the problem. > > In 99% of problems, these are enough to identify the culprit. > > If you feel a bit adventurous and have the time, you can learn a bit > about debugging (see section 18.2, "Edebug", of the Elisp manual) and > trace the execution of the function. If you don't know elisp, you may > feel somewhat apprehensive about this, but it's a good way to dig deeper > into emacs. > > Nick