From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: How do I pass a variable defined in a wrapping let, to a lambda? Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2022 21:57:06 +0100 Message-ID: References: <871qz85bwh.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22788"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (windows-nt) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 12 21:57:50 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nT8o9-0005mT-DU for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 21:57:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57260 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nT8o7-0003gH-Q6 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 15:57:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33474) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nT8nd-0003g9-Ce for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 15:57:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:41c9:1:424::90] (port=34222 helo=cadalora.default.sbang.bv.iomart.io) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nT8nb-0000LR-H0 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 15:57:17 -0500 Original-Received: from AAP-5CG8284ZXT (unknown [84.210.87.211]) by cadalora.default.sbang.bv.iomart.io (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B416E105557 for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 20:57:11 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier via Users list for the's message of "Sat, 12 Mar 2022 14:09:38 -0500") X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2001:41c9:1:424::90 (failed) Received-SPF: none client-ip=2001:41c9:1:424::90; envelope-from=sb@dod.no; helo=cadalora.default.sbang.bv.iomart.io X-Spam_score_int: -10 X-Spam_score: -1.1 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:136503 Archived-At: >>>>> Stefan Monnier via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor : >> I think what I meant was "should I enable lexical-binding in .emacs?" > Yes, just like in all ELisp files. Ah, well! It does seem like the most logical behaviour.