From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: usability issue
Date: 11 Jan 2003 14:28:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x5wulberxn.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 84adi7j1vh.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de
kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai Großjohann) writes:
> "Ehud Karni" <ehud@unix.mvs.co.il> writes:
>
> > Because beginning-of-line and end-of-line are more useful and we
> > want to use only 1 key for these functions.
>
> I once wrote something that allows you to hit <home> once to go to
> beginning of line, twice in a row to go to the beginning of the
> window, and thrice to go to the beginning of the buffer.
>
> The implementation sucks somewhat, I'm afraid.
>
> But I think the feature is good, so WIBNI this functionality came
> standard with Emacs? What do people think.
I'd think beginning of window odious. I would recommend start of
line, start of section/defun, start of buffer.
As to the implementation: I would recommend to make it stateless: the
implementation will simply check whether the cursor currently is at
the start of line/section and move to the beginning of the smallest
unit for which it is not yet already at the beginning.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-11 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-06 21:59 usability issue Tuomo Takkula
2003-01-06 22:17 ` David Kastrup
2003-01-06 22:52 ` Alan Shutko
2003-01-07 0:37 ` Miles Bader
2003-01-08 12:42 ` Ehud Karni
[not found] ` <mailman.58.1042029785.21513.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2003-01-11 12:40 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-01-11 13:28 ` David Kastrup [this message]
2003-01-16 6:25 ` Andrew
2003-01-16 6:41 ` John Paul Wallington
2003-01-16 10:11 ` Andrew
2003-01-16 10:23 ` David Kastrup
2003-01-16 10:44 ` Andrew Brehaut
2003-01-16 11:02 ` David Kastrup
2003-01-16 11:24 ` Andrew Brehaut
2003-01-16 10:50 ` John Paul Wallington
2003-01-16 11:34 ` Colin Marquardt
2003-01-07 20:00 ` Tuomo Takkula
2003-01-06 22:43 ` Henrik Enberg
2003-01-07 1:02 ` Bruce Ingalls
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x5wulberxn.fsf@lola.goethe.zz \
--to=dak@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).