* Separating stdout and stderr with asynchronous processes
@ 2004-04-26 21:24 Matthieu Moy
2004-04-26 22:03 ` Kevin Rodgers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Matthieu Moy @ 2004-04-26 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi!
Is it possible to split standard output and standard error of a
process started with `start-process'?
It's possible to redirect stderr to a file with `call-process', but
the same trick doesn't apply to `start-process'.
Any idea?
--
Matthieu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Separating stdout and stderr with asynchronous processes
2004-04-26 21:24 Separating stdout and stderr with asynchronous processes Matthieu Moy
@ 2004-04-26 22:03 ` Kevin Rodgers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Rodgers @ 2004-04-26 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
Matthieu Moy wrote:
> Is it possible to split standard output and standard error of a
> process started with `start-process'?
>
> It's possible to redirect stderr to a file with `call-process', but
> the same trick doesn't apply to `start-process'.
You could use start-process-shell-command, and use redirection in the
shell command.
--
Kevin Rodgers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-04-26 22:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-04-26 21:24 Separating stdout and stderr with asynchronous processes Matthieu Moy
2004-04-26 22:03 ` Kevin Rodgers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).