From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Customizing coding priority Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:27:38 +0100 Organization: Dept. of Theoretical Physics, University of Ulm Message-ID: References: <17837.26945.133317.830421@kamaloka.dhatu> <17837.55152.906774.97483@relwi-sven.unibe.ch> <17838.42714.915656.255057@relwi-sven.unibe.ch> <17839.40064.616634.841398@relwi-sven.unibe.ch> <1E5A79AD-14AE-498F-BD8C-FDDE198F5CCC@Web.DE> Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1169145726 19140 80.91.229.12 (18 Jan 2007 18:42:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:42:06 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 18 19:42:02 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H7cD0-0003QZ-8X for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:41:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7cD1-0007Hk-2e for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:41:59 -0500 Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help X-Face: mtjf/D:es1T0wHO:&CJ'ZXe"l; 3C--rw\z!{`eFwL){|]RpI+4{u25L=5C /0>KuGeTsk<~<&NE-AKV1560e!+RJeyWmSskkrJm?[vUV#66{T_m|Ae<||Ku#Mk5`y&O`n~z2; n8eP J5#2h@2eQgV@E70IY_0WlEx!"&giy{+\%h1LJox$zv@/l%ZmU4^tZA>xQpnkUBVC5.jpg#0'(+2?Rs )NAr:>3<=WxHE$ktbLysDIM5TbmHu*3 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:40424 Archived-At: On Thu, Jan 18 2007, Peter Dyballa wrote: > Am 18.01.2007 um 17:12 schrieb Sven Bretfeld: > >> Anyway, what Peter and Tom remark sounds strange. There must be some >> difference in the umlauts of the two coding systems, at least for >> Emacs. > > Yes, there is in GNU Emacs. The characters don't stand alone, they have some > encoding attribute. Unicode Emacs 23.0.0 cancels this, finally. Your usage of "GNU Emacs" and "Unicode Emacs" here is wrong or at least misleading, IMHO. See also (info "(efaq)Difference between Emacs and XEmacs"). > Probably vm has some restrictions. GNU Emacs 22 won't solve the problem, NACK. `unify-8859-on-encoding-mode' and `unify-8859-on-decoding-mode' are sufficient to solve this problem WRT to iso-8859-{1,15} even in Emacs 21.[34]. > GNU Emacs 23 might! (I simply gave up and switched to a different > MUA.) Even with Emacs 21.4, there are no problems with charsets when using Gnus. `rs-ucs-coding-system.el'[1] might be interesting when support for windows-12xx and/or additional iso-8859 charset (-6, -10, -11, -13, -16), see the table in [1]. Bye, Reiner. [1] -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/