From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de> Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Which mail client? Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 22:17:50 +0200 Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87r7tg13mp.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> <874qqb45ra.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1085088524 4849 80.91.224.253 (20 May 2004 21:28:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 21:28:44 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 20 23:28:37 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BQv5h-0003bj-00 for ; Thu, 20 May 2004 23:28:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BQuED-00019q-FR for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 May 2004 16:33:21 -0400 Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help X-Face: mtjf/D:es1T0wHO:&CJ'ZXe"l; 3C--rw\z!{`eFwL){|]RpI+4{u25L=5C /0>KuGeTsk<~<&NE-AKV1560e!+RJeyWmSskkrJm?[vUV#66{T_m|Ae<||Ku#Mk5`y&O`n~z2; n8eP J5#2h@2eQgV@E70IY_0WlEx!"&giy{+\%h1LJox$zv@/l%ZmU4^tZA>xQpnkUBVC5.jpg#0'(+2?Rs )NAr:>3<=WxHE$ktbLysDIM5TbmHu*3 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:18628 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:18628 On Thu, May 20 2004, Miles Bader wrote: > s1726@ii.uib.no (Steinar Børmer) writes: >> I haven't tried Gnus 5.9.0 with IMAP, but I've been told that the more >> recent versions (especially No Gnus, which I'm using) have notably >> better IMAP speed and general functionality improvements. I don't recall any major changes related to IMAP from Gnus 5.10 to No Gnus. > How's No Gnus generally for stability? [...] > I tried it out on a lark today (while setting up the gnus arch archive), > and it flaked out pretty badly, undefined variable errors, couldn't read > mail (got it from the server, but failed to store it in my mail > folders!). [...] > However, I presume it may have simply been a bad time. Probably. Compare the activity in the ChangeLog within the last week to the previous months. No Gnus is a developer version after all. But apart from yesterday, I didn't have serious problems. If you see problems when upgrading from 5.9 to 5.10.6, please report them on ding. Is your arch archive (for Gnus) already set up? Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- PGP key available via WWW http://rsteib.home.pages.de/