From: Klaus Berndl <klaus.berndl@sdm.de>
Subject: Re: ECB for LaTeX?
Date: 13 May 2003 18:13:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uu1bylt9r.fsf@sdm.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: vf7k8v3rd5.fsf@rpc71.cs.man.ac.uk
I think, in my role as the ECB-maintainer i can bring some light into the
darkness ;-)
On 13 May 2003, Phillip Lord wrote:
> >>>>> "Kai" == Kai Großjohann <kai.grossjohann@gmx.net> writes:
>
> Kai> I'm wondering if ECB would be of any help for composing LaTeX
> Kai> documents. Opinions?
>
> It should be. The new version in CVS does a speedbar like display in
Not only a speedbar-like mechanism - it is the speedbar mechanism. In fact,
ECB uses the original speedbar-mechanism for displaying file-contents of
file-types which can not being parsed by semantic but by imenu and/or etags.
So, if speedbar can parse the file-type, ECB will be autom. able too!
> the methods buffer (or sections, subsections and so on), although when
> I last tried this it didn't work cleanly, and sadly I have no had time
> to write up a good bug report.
Yes, i know...this was the reason i have posted an announcement in the
ECB-mailing list about the new feature in the CVS...people should beta-test
this so i can make this feature stable for next production-version of ECB.
Currently I'm quite busy but i hope to find the time in the near future to fix
currently existing bugs in this new feature.
And for this some bug-reports from users would be really helpful ;-)
But parsing- and displaying stuff of this new feature works already well
(other opinions are appreciated!), the only thing i have to fix is the
integration into ECB concerning when to reparse/update the display, flushing
the cache...should not be too hard!
> This was a feature that I asked for,
> because the methods buffer was empty when using latex, when it would
> have been very useful.
Yes, thanks to Phil for this suggestion!
Ciao,
Klaus
> Phil
--
Klaus Berndl mailto: klaus.berndl@sdm.de
sd&m AG http://www.sdm.de
software design & management
Thomas-Dehler-Str. 27, 81737 München, Germany
Tel +49 89 63812-392, Fax -220
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-13 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-13 13:04 ECB for LaTeX? Kai Großjohann
2003-05-13 13:31 ` Phillip Lord
2003-05-13 16:13 ` Klaus Berndl [this message]
2003-05-13 16:19 ` Klaus Berndl
2003-05-13 18:59 ` Martin Stemplinger
2003-05-14 9:04 ` Klaus Berndl
2003-05-15 19:16 ` Martin Stemplinger
2003-05-13 16:30 ` Phillip Lord
2003-05-13 20:01 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-05-14 9:04 ` Klaus Berndl
2003-05-14 19:23 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-05-26 7:21 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-05-26 15:07 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-05-28 9:14 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-05-28 11:13 ` Asmund Ostvold
2003-05-28 16:48 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-06-10 11:30 ` Klaus Berndl
2003-06-10 13:51 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-10 14:17 ` Eric Ludlam
2003-06-10 14:27 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-10 14:36 ` Klaus Berndl
2003-06-10 15:09 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-11 8:03 ` Klaus Berndl
2003-06-11 14:47 ` Eric Ludlam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=uu1bylt9r.fsf@sdm.de \
--to=klaus.berndl@sdm.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).