From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Galen Boyer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: New frame position (FSF Emacs on Windows) Date: 7 Feb 2003 20:30:12 -0600 Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1044673491 21010 80.91.224.249 (8 Feb 2003 03:04:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 03:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18hLIQ-0005Sj-00 for ; Sat, 08 Feb 2003 04:04:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18hLJ3-0006ZU-04 for gnu-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2003 22:05:29 -0500 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!enews.sgi.com!nntp1.phx1.gblx.net!nntp.gblx.net!nntp.gblx.net!newsfeed.news2me.com!novia!newscene!newscene!novia!novia!sequencer.newscene.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 14 Original-Sender: galenboyer@hotpop.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:109941 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:6446 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:6446 On Fri, 07 Feb 2003, gustav@morpheus.demon.co.uk wrote: > I currently use XEmacs 21.5.10 on Windows (2000 and XP), mainly for > news/mail via Gnus and occasionally for general editing tasks. I'm > considering switching over to FSF Emacs 21.2.1, mainly because it > seems to start up enormously faster. (Is this generally true, or is it > just me? If it is true, what causes the difference?) I think most people don't consider start up time as a factor for their decision in using versions of Emacs. Most keep Emacs running for weeks/months. -- Galen deForest Boyer Sweet dreams and flying machines in pieces on the ground.