From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: rahed Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: cperl-mode Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 10:17:03 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87tzqfatlh.fsf@lion.rapttech.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1188641849 31168 80.91.229.12 (1 Sep 2007 10:17:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 10:17:29 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 01 12:17:28 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IRQ2h-0000EQ-IO for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 12:17:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IRQ2g-0006p3-MZ for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 06:17:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IRQ2O-0006o5-0S for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 06:17:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IRQ2N-0006nr-8L for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 06:17:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IRQ2N-0006no-1h for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 06:17:07 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IRQ2M-0000BX-IC for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 06:17:06 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IRQ2L-0005VG-88 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 12:17:05 +0200 Original-Received: from 88.103.41.197 ([88.103.41.197]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 12:17:05 +0200 Original-Received: from raherh by 88.103.41.197 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 12:17:05 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.103.41.197 User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:dWgHuaq7TaWpyreUU/MFq/6wipE= X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:47063 Archived-At: Tim X writes: > Interesting regarding your reference to reports that cperl-mode is almost > unusable under emacs 22. I've not found this. I have noticed some > fontification that doesn't look correct and do get considerable 'error > messages' reported in the mini-buffer concerning unmatched parens etc, but > yo don't get this if your inserting parens or other delimiters in > pairs. For exmaple, qw/ will give unmatched/unbalanced errors after every > character you insert. I guess its possible this could impact on > performance. However, if you do qw/ /, with point inbetween the /s, then > you don't get the warning/errors after each character you insert. > > I tend to use some of the 'hairy' options, which means when I do something > like an if or for/foreach etc, most of the delimiters are automatically > added in matched pairs - maybe thats why I'm not having the problems others have reported. > > I've not noticed any problems with scrolling of pages or any slowness - not > sure if thats because I'm not suffering the same problems or maybe I'm just > naturally slow and therefore don't notice it! I also hear this for the first time, I don't experience any of these problems and don't use 'hairy' options. -- Radek