From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Brian Elmegaard Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is buffer size fixed in batch mode? Date: 07 Dec 2005 11:32:07 +0100 Message-ID: References: <853bl5ckk4.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85pso9b42m.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133961659 15608 80.91.229.2 (7 Dec 2005 13:20:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:20:59 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 07 14:20:57 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjzBW-0002RN-4o for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 14:18:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjzBf-0002d6-OZ for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 08:18:23 -0500 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!dotsrc.org!news.dotsrc.org!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 Original-Lines: 12 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.226.18.60 Original-X-Trace: news.sunsite.dk DXC=]6OVE8`GVnmnC^B`UVjTRcYSB=nbEKnkk3InNh=l7?FoY@@S3>dFS@iS>FFT2; LKLko8XK\aPXknbC68c18cb1koFQniZF161`a Original-X-Complaints-To: staff@sunsite.dk Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:136129 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:31740 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: > in batchmode. batchmode happens to be different. Not least of all, > because there is no current window and several initialization files > don't get loaded. Of course. Thanks. -- Brian (remove the sport for mail) http://www.et.web.mek.dtu.dk/Staff/be/be.html http://www.rugbyklubben-speed.dk