From: Klaus Berndl <Klaus.Berndl@raibau.raiffeisen.at>
Subject: Re: emacs or xemacs?
Date: 12 Sep 2002 10:29:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ulm677gqw.fsf@raibau.raiffeisen.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: lysn0gb1ur.fsf@bock.chem.unc.edu
On 11 Sep 2002, Jochen Küpper wrote:
> On 11 Sep 2002 10:34:06 +0200 Klaus Berndl wrote:
>
> Klaus> AFAIK this not correct: XEmacs has this nifty net-installer
> Klaus> ported from Cygwin to the needs of XEmacs whereas GNU Emacs
> Klaus> must still be installed by downloading one big archive
> Klaus> (regardless of source-distrib or precompiled binaries),
> Klaus> extracing it, reading the READMe and so on...
>
> Actually Emacs is (3 packages) in the standard Cygwin install nowadays...
Oooops... AFAIK there is no official release port of GNU Emacs to Cygwin...
Is this not true anymore?? Is there now an official port of GNU Emacs 21.X to
cygwin (downloadable binaries build with cygwin and installable by the cygwin
setup)?
Ciao,klaus
--
Klaus Berndl mailto: klaus.berndl@sdm.de
sd&m AG http://www.sdm.de
software design & management
Thomas-Dehler-Str. 27, 81737 München, Germany
Tel +49 89 63812-392, Fax -220
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-12 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.1031674809.15931.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2002-09-10 17:34 ` emacs or xemacs? Alex Schroeder
2002-09-10 18:57 ` Lute Kamstra
2002-09-10 20:04 ` Henrik Enberg
2002-09-10 20:40 ` Lute Kamstra
2002-09-10 20:48 ` No HTML mails in Gnus (was: emacs or xemacs?) Alex Schroeder
2002-09-10 21:06 ` Lute Kamstra
2002-09-10 19:05 ` emacs or xemacs? Stefan Monnier <foo@acm.com>
2002-09-11 7:51 ` Adam
2002-09-11 8:21 ` Aurelio
2002-09-11 8:21 ` Aurelio
2002-09-11 8:34 ` Klaus Berndl
2002-09-11 10:35 ` Sacha Chua
2002-09-11 22:25 ` Jochen Küpper
2002-09-12 8:29 ` Klaus Berndl [this message]
2002-09-12 9:14 ` Zhongtao Zhu
2002-09-12 14:23 ` Jochen Küpper
2002-09-12 19:33 ` maierh
2002-09-12 15:51 ` D. Goel
2002-09-11 21:36 ` Rodney Sparapani
2005-05-22 21:14 Emacs or XEmacs? JS
2005-05-22 21:28 ` David Kastrup
2005-05-22 23:30 ` Tim Johnson
2005-05-23 5:23 ` It's me FKtPp ;)
2005-05-23 16:09 ` Drew Adams
2005-05-23 18:23 ` Alan Mackenzie
[not found] <mailman.1031732603.1996.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2002-09-14 8:33 ` emacs or xemacs? A. L. Meyers
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-10 16:18 Aurelio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ulm677gqw.fsf@raibau.raiffeisen.at \
--to=klaus.berndl@raibau.raiffeisen.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).