From: Klaus Berndl <Klaus.Berndl@raibau.raiffeisen.at>
Subject: Re: emacs or xemacs?
Date: 11 Sep 2002 10:34:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <u65xdylfl.fsf@raibau.raiffeisen.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: GBCf9.8567$kj1.64351252@news-text.cableinet.net
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, a24061@void.yahoo.void.com wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 September 2002 17:18, Aurelio wrote:
>
> > Hello!!! First of all, you must be patient with my english writing...
> > Thanks!!!!
> > I am going to use emcas. I usually use VIM but now it´s time to
> > change... And here´s my first ask: emacs or xemacs??? What is the
> > difference?? I think emacs21 have a good graphic display... But is
> > xemacs more usefull???
> > Thanks
>
> If you have to use a Windoze system, XEmacs is easier to install. But if
> you're using Cygwin it's not difficult to install GNU Emacs. On a proper
> OS, they're both about the same to install. (Most Linux distros come with
> both now.)
AFAIK this not correct: XEmacs has this nifty net-installer ported from Cygwin
to the needs of XEmacs whereas GNU Emacs must still be installed by
downloading one big archive (regardless of source-distrib or precompiled
binaries), extracing it, reading the READMe and so on...
Though i prefer GNU Emacs as editor IMHO the installation of XEmacs is much
more convenient than GNU Emacs (ok, i must admit, downloading the archive,
extracting it and some small steps more are not really difficult but
nevertheless.... :-)
Of course all this is only related to Windows systems!
Ciao,
Klaus
>
> But GNU Emacs is the One True Emacs!
--
Klaus Berndl mailto: klaus.berndl@sdm.de
sd&m AG http://www.sdm.de
software design & management
Thomas-Dehler-Str. 27, 81737 München, Germany
Tel +49 89 63812-392, Fax -220
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-11 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.1031674809.15931.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2002-09-10 17:34 ` emacs or xemacs? Alex Schroeder
2002-09-10 18:57 ` Lute Kamstra
2002-09-10 20:04 ` Henrik Enberg
2002-09-10 20:40 ` Lute Kamstra
2002-09-10 20:48 ` No HTML mails in Gnus (was: emacs or xemacs?) Alex Schroeder
2002-09-10 21:06 ` Lute Kamstra
2002-09-10 19:05 ` emacs or xemacs? Stefan Monnier <foo@acm.com>
2002-09-11 7:51 ` Adam
2002-09-11 8:21 ` Aurelio
2002-09-11 8:21 ` Aurelio
2002-09-11 8:34 ` Klaus Berndl [this message]
2002-09-11 10:35 ` Sacha Chua
2002-09-11 22:25 ` Jochen Küpper
2002-09-12 8:29 ` Klaus Berndl
2002-09-12 9:14 ` Zhongtao Zhu
2002-09-12 14:23 ` Jochen Küpper
2002-09-12 19:33 ` maierh
2002-09-12 15:51 ` D. Goel
2002-09-11 21:36 ` Rodney Sparapani
2005-05-22 21:14 Emacs or XEmacs? JS
2005-05-22 21:28 ` David Kastrup
2005-05-22 23:30 ` Tim Johnson
2005-05-23 5:23 ` It's me FKtPp ;)
2005-05-23 16:09 ` Drew Adams
2005-05-23 18:23 ` Alan Mackenzie
[not found] <mailman.1031732603.1996.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2002-09-14 8:33 ` emacs or xemacs? A. L. Meyers
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-10 16:18 Aurelio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=u65xdylfl.fsf@raibau.raiffeisen.at \
--to=klaus.berndl@raibau.raiffeisen.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).