From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: lawrence mitchell Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: invisible buffer is it possible? Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 15:44:33 +0000 Organization: funfunfun Sender: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <5llm3gnz02.fsf@rum.cs.yale.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1038325553 8821 80.91.224.249 (26 Nov 2002 15:45:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 15:45:53 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18GhuH-0002Hd-00 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 16:45:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18Ghus-0007pD-00; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:46:26 -0500 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!vegetable.demon.co.UK!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 17 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: vegetable.demon.co.uk (80.177.16.3) Original-X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1038325473 24105829 80.177.16.3 (16 [97657]) X-No-Yes: No Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2.90 (i386-mingw-nt5.0.2195) Cancel-Lock: sha1:DQhe/LDRif30JMRHrxAZqdiREhc= Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:107485 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:4036 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:4036 Phillip Lord wrote: [...] > You wouldn't have thought so would you. None the less, there it > is. > PSGML opens up the parent document when it loads a child. So > with this hook in, any time you open "build.xml", then the > anthead.xml file will also get opened. Its buried, but its > there. Look at `sgml-load-doctype' and `sgml-in-file-eval'. Which seem to be the main culprits. -- lawrence mitchell