unofficial mirror of help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ilya Zakharevich <nospam-abuse@ilyaz.org>
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: cperl-mode - how people outline their code?
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:07:58 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrnht78vu.por.nospam-abuse@powdermilk.math.berkeley.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dcbcbc64-ba49-4a05-866c-341c6c99899e@j17g2000yqa.googlegroups.com

On 2010-04-23, LanX <lanx.perl@googlemail.com> wrote:
> more folding on =pods would be nice, too.

Right now I have no idea what this might mean: essentially, we have an
"interleaved" file with two different "channels": code, and POD.  Each
one of them has its notion of "outline level", so if they were
separate, one could outline them without much problem.

Now how would these two different outline semantics be reflected on
the "interleaved" file?  Would one want to have two different "active"
levels, one for POD, another for code?

Puzzled,
Ilya


  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-25  2:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-19 15:12 cperl-mode - outline minor mode - subroutines Terrence Brannon
2010-04-19 16:16 ` LanX
2010-04-19 16:39   ` Terrence Brannon
2010-04-19 16:49     ` LanX
2010-04-21 18:28       ` Terrence Brannon
2010-04-22  1:25         ` LanX
2010-04-19 16:41   ` LanX
2010-04-19 18:02     ` Terrence Brannon
2010-04-20  8:22       ` LanX
2010-04-20 19:10         ` Terrence Brannon
2010-04-21 13:52           ` LanX
2010-04-21 18:36             ` David Rogoff
2010-04-23 20:49             ` cperl-mode - how people outline their code? Ilya Zakharevich
2010-04-23 23:09               ` LanX
2010-04-25  2:07                 ` Ilya Zakharevich [this message]
2010-04-25 10:15                   ` LanX
2010-04-25 11:36                     ` LanX
2010-04-27  4:13                       ` Ilya Zakharevich
2010-05-04 14:59                         ` LanX
2010-07-01 16:16                   ` Ted Zlatanov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=slrnht78vu.por.nospam-abuse@powdermilk.math.berkeley.edu \
    --to=nospam-abuse@ilyaz.org \
    --cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).