From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Maarten Bergvelt Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: lisp question Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 19:21:13 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Department of Mathematics, UIUC. Message-ID: References: Reply-To: bergv@uiuc.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1178053078 17021 80.91.229.12 (1 May 2007 20:57:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 20:57:58 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 01 22:57:52 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HizPx-0001kJ-Mp for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 May 2007 22:57:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HizWI-0002GY-5i for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 May 2007 17:04:22 -0400 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newshub.stanford.edu!news.ks.uiuc.edu!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 8 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: bolmikolke.math.uiuc.edu Original-X-Trace: news.ks.uiuc.edu 1178047273 19595 130.126.108.244 (1 May 2007 19:21:13 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: news+abuse@ks.uiuc.edu Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 19:21:13 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:147845 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 01 May 2007 17:03:35 -0400 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:43455 Archived-At: In article , A Soare wrote: > What determined the mathematicians to give the definition of x^0 = 1, not defined for x=0 ? Discussion of this point at http://www.faqs.org/faqs/sci-math-faq/specialnumbers/0to0/ -- Maarten Bergvelt