* apropos inconsistancy
@ 2006-10-22 16:56 Tim Johnson
2006-10-22 17:29 ` Harald Hanche-Olsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tim Johnson @ 2006-10-22 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
:-) Don't ask me to speak the subject before I have my coffee.
Seriously, Apropos on emacs sometimes gives me much less than Xemacs
does. More often certain items that appear in xemacs do not appear
in GNU emacs (with apropos) , whereas ch f will match them.
Here is an example:
c-h a split <ret>
Xemacs shows me 'split-string
emacs does not
Could it be be that I have a misconfiguration in my emacs
setup that interferes with apropos?
Thanks
tim
--
Tim Johnson <tim@johnsons-web.com>
http://www.alaska-internet-solutions.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: apropos inconsistancy
2006-10-22 16:56 apropos inconsistancy Tim Johnson
@ 2006-10-22 17:29 ` Harald Hanche-Olsen
2006-10-22 17:56 ` Tim Johnson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Harald Hanche-Olsen @ 2006-10-22 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
+ Tim Johnson <tim@johnsons-web.com>:
| :-) Don't ask me to speak the subject before I have my coffee.
We only ask that you spell it. 8-)
| Here is an example:
| c-h a split <ret>
|
| Xemacs shows me 'split-string
| emacs does not
|
| Could it be be that I have a misconfiguration in my emacs
| setup that interferes with apropos?
Could it be that you have not read the documentation for apropos?
C-h k C-h a
And could it be that you haven't tried prefixing the command thusly?
C-u C-h a split
Nah, that couldn't be. Enjoy your coffee.
--
* Harald Hanche-Olsen <URL:http://www.math.ntnu.no/~hanche/>
- It is undesirable to believe a proposition
when there is no ground whatsoever for supposing it is true.
-- Bertrand Russell
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: apropos inconsistancy
2006-10-22 17:29 ` Harald Hanche-Olsen
@ 2006-10-22 17:56 ` Tim Johnson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tim Johnson @ 2006-10-22 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
On 2006-10-22, Harald Hanche-Olsen <hanche@math.ntnu.no> wrote:
> + Tim Johnson <tim@johnsons-web.com>:
>
>| :-) Don't ask me to speak the subject before I have my coffee.
>
> We only ask that you spell it. 8-)
>
> Could it be that you have not read the documentation for apropos?
Help on Help?
> C-h k C-h a
Eureka!
> And could it be that you haven't tried prefixing the command thusly?
>
> C-u C-h a split
>
> Nah, that couldn't be. Enjoy your coffee.
Now I don't have to leave Xemacs open ...
thanks
cheers
tj
--
Tim Johnson <tim@johnsons-web.com>
http://www.alaska-internet-solutions.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-10-22 17:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-10-22 16:56 apropos inconsistancy Tim Johnson
2006-10-22 17:29 ` Harald Hanche-Olsen
2006-10-22 17:56 ` Tim Johnson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).