From: Greg Hill <ghill@synergymicro.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with re-search-backward and "\\="
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:57:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <p04310101bb8d0d1fab10@[198.17.100.22]> (raw)
>GNU Emacs 21.1
>
>Suppose I have this in a buffer:
>
>foo bar
>
>If point is immediately after foo, then (re-search-forward "\\= *")
>leaves point immediately before bar, as one would expect.
>
>However, with point immediately before bar (re-search-backward " *\\=")
>fails. I would have expected this search to have succeeded, leaving
>point just after foo.
>
>The definition of `\=' in the elisp info page "Regexp Backslash" is:
>
>> matches the empty string, but only at point. (This construct is not
>> defined when matching against a string.)
>
>Is this a bug, or have I misunderstood something?
Alan,
You have misunderstood the nature of the "greediness" of the '*' --
and probably also the '+' -- postfix operator when applied to
backward searches. It is not "symmetrical" with its effect on
forward searches. I suggest you do some experimentation with these
operators, never minding the "\\=" for the moment, to better
understand the way these postfix operators work.
I may not have this completely right, but this is the way I
conceptualize it. When searching forward, the match-beginning
advances forward from point until the first possible match is found;
then match-beginning is fixed and match-end advances until going any
farther would break the rule or exceed the specified limit. In
searching backward, the match-beginning moves backward until the
first possible match is found; then match-beninning is fixed and the
match-end advances forward until going any farther would break the
rule, using the initial value of point as the limit to how far the
match-end is allowed to advance.
I have never experimented with the "non-greedy" postfix operators
'*?' '+?' and '??', so I can't tell you how using them effects the
conceptualization described above.
I hope this helps.
--Greg
next reply other threads:[~2003-09-16 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-16 18:57 Greg Hill [this message]
[not found] <mailman.313.1063738732.21628.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2003-09-17 8:13 ` Problem with re-search-backward and "\\=" Alan Mackenzie
2003-09-17 17:39 ` Greg Hill
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-16 16:44 Alan Mackenzie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='p04310101bb8d0d1fab10@[198.17.100.22]' \
--to=ghill@synergymicro.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).