unofficial mirror of help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Hill <ghill@synergymicro.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with re-search-backward and "\\="
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:57:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <p04310101bb8d0d1fab10@[198.17.100.22]> (raw)

>GNU Emacs 21.1
>
>Suppose I have this in a buffer:
>
>foo     bar
>
>If point is immediately after foo, then (re-search-forward "\\= *")
>leaves point immediately before bar, as one would expect.
>
>However, with point immediately before bar (re-search-backward " *\\=")
>fails.  I would have expected this search to have succeeded, leaving
>point just after foo.
>
>The definition of `\=' in the elisp info page "Regexp Backslash" is:
>
>>  matches the empty string, but only at point.  (This construct is not
>>  defined when matching against a string.)
>
>Is this a bug, or have I misunderstood something?

Alan,

You have misunderstood the nature of the "greediness" of the '*' -- 
and probably also the '+' -- postfix operator when applied to 
backward searches.  It is not "symmetrical" with its effect on 
forward searches.  I suggest you do some experimentation with these 
operators, never minding the "\\=" for the moment, to better 
understand the way these postfix operators work.

I may not have this completely right, but this is the way I 
conceptualize it.  When searching forward, the match-beginning 
advances forward from point until the first possible match is found; 
then match-beginning is fixed and match-end advances until going any 
farther would break the rule or exceed the specified limit.  In 
searching backward, the match-beginning moves backward until the 
first possible match is found; then match-beninning is fixed and the 
match-end advances forward until going any farther would break the 
rule, using the initial value of point as the limit to how far the 
match-end is allowed to advance.

I have never experimented with the "non-greedy" postfix operators 
'*?' '+?' and '??', so I can't tell you how using them effects the 
conceptualization described above.

I hope this helps.

--Greg

             reply	other threads:[~2003-09-16 18:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-16 18:57 Greg Hill [this message]
     [not found] <mailman.313.1063738732.21628.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2003-09-17  8:13 ` Problem with re-search-backward and "\\=" Alan Mackenzie
2003-09-17 17:39   ` Greg Hill
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-16 16:44 Alan Mackenzie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='p04310101bb8d0d1fab10@[198.17.100.22]' \
    --to=ghill@synergymicro.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).