unofficial mirror of help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why I can't use `info' in emacs?
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:11:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <nkzm9l86xs.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1166447540.507199.23610@l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com

"Robert Thorpe" <rthorpe@realworldtech.com> writes:

> Hadron Quark wrote:
>> "Robert Thorpe" <rthorpe@realworldtech.com> writes:
>> > Hadron Quark wrote:
>> >> "Robert Thorpe" <rthorpe@realworldtech.com> writes:
>> >> > Hadron Quark wrote:
>> >> >> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >> From: Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:25:55 +0100
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Surely the man pages are superior in this instance for a programmer?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > How is the man page superior?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Did you look at the excerpts which came up from the context. For a
>> >> >> programmer bringing up the API it is blatantly obvious, in this case,
>> >> >> which first stage info is more useful.
>> >> >
>> >> > The most common reason I have for looking at API docs is to remind me
>> >> > of the order of arguments in a function.  Mostly I can remember the
>> >> > functions purpose.  We're all different.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Hence the man page is superior :-;
>> >
>> > For this particular purpose both contain the same information.
>> >
>> > The Man page contains:-
>> > int printf(const char *format, ...);
>> > And the Info page:-
>> > -- Function: int printf (const char *TEMPLATE, ...)
>> >
>>
>> No they dont.
>
> Speaking of my own usage of docs I said:-
> "The most common reason I have for looking at API docs is to remind me
> of the order of arguments in a function."
> This was the topic under discussion.  From that point of view both the
> man page and info node are similar since they give the prototype of the
> function in the first few lines of the response.
>
>> The man page is the complete man page for printf.
>
> Not really.  The man page documents only a few of the capabilities of
> printf and friends that are specified by standards bodies.  If you want
> to read about all their capabilities you must use the info pages or
> HTML pages.
>

if you think that first level "info" page which comes up is more
applicable for a programmer then fine. Personally I dont. man pages are
the de-facto linux standard with info coming second. In this case the
man page which comes up in emacs has far more pertinent information than
the info page which comes up. For me. Maybe we have to beg to differ.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-18 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-14 23:59 Why I can't use `info' in emacs? Ronald
2006-12-15  6:50 ` Harald Hanche-Olsen
2006-12-15  7:15   ` Ronald
2006-12-15 12:40     ` Robert Thorpe
2006-12-15 14:18       ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-12-15  8:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
     [not found] ` <mailman.1908.1166172009.2155.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2006-12-15  9:20   ` Ronald
2006-12-15 11:17     ` Eli Zaretskii
     [not found]     ` <mailman.1911.1166181447.2155.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2006-12-15 13:49       ` Hadron Quark
2006-12-15 14:02         ` Robert Thorpe
2006-12-15 14:13           ` Hadron Quark
2006-12-15 14:25           ` Hadron Quark
2006-12-15 14:57             ` Robert Thorpe
2006-12-15 15:49               ` Hadron Quark
2006-12-15 17:41                 ` Robert Thorpe
2006-12-18  0:10               ` Giorgos Keramidas
2006-12-18 11:51                 ` Robert Thorpe
2006-12-20  1:13                   ` Giorgos Keramidas
2006-12-20 16:51                     ` Robert Thorpe
2006-12-15 15:57             ` Eli Zaretskii
     [not found]             ` <mailman.1922.1166198262.2155.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2006-12-15 16:27               ` Hadron Quark
2006-12-15 18:11                 ` Robert Thorpe
2006-12-16 19:21                   ` Hadron Quark
2006-12-16 21:51                     ` Eli Zaretskii
     [not found]                     ` <mailman.1996.1166305877.2155.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2006-12-16 22:30                       ` Hadron Quark
2006-12-17  4:12                         ` Eli Zaretskii
     [not found]                         ` <mailman.2006.1166328762.2155.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2006-12-18 12:54                           ` Hadron Quark
2006-12-18 20:01                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-12-18 10:44                     ` Robert Thorpe
2006-12-18 12:56                       ` Hadron Quark
2006-12-18 13:12                         ` Robert Thorpe
2006-12-18 17:11                           ` Hadron Quark [this message]
2006-12-18 17:27                             ` Robert Thorpe
2006-12-16 12:04                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-12-15  9:20   ` Ronald

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=nkzm9l86xs.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=hadronquark@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).