From: Subhankar Chatterjee <subhankar@dzineassociates.com>
Subject: Re: Why have "shell" when there's "term"
Date: 10 Jun 2003 00:42:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3u1az3w0z.fsf@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: bbq34b$hnj$1@reader1.panix.com
Hello,
J Krugman <jill_krugman@yahoo.com> writes:
> It seems to me that "M-x term" is in every way superior to "M-x
> shell". What's the point of the latter?
Try the Emacs shell or [M-x eshell]
> -Jill
Regards
-Subhankar
--
blue pill or red pill
--
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-09 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-06 12:57 Why have "shell" when there's "term" J Krugman
2003-06-06 14:13 ` Lute Kamstra
2003-06-06 15:13 ` Lute Kamstra
2003-06-06 14:32 ` Hallvard B Furuseth
2003-06-07 11:41 ` Lute Kamstra
2003-06-06 16:50 ` Eric Hanchrow
2003-06-06 22:11 ` J Krugman
2003-06-06 23:10 ` Barry Margolin
2003-06-09 19:12 ` Subhankar Chatterjee [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3u1az3w0z.fsf@localhost.localdomain \
--to=subhankar@dzineassociates.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).