From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Tromey Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Another 'best' practices question ?? Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 11:21:45 -0600 Message-ID: References: <1178214443.3172.18.camel@CASE> <463A22EF.7060707@gmail.com> <1178220921.3172.31.camel@CASE> <463ACED2.3000006@physik.hu-berlin.de> <87hcqsd34h.fsf@moley.org> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1178300502 19713 80.91.229.12 (4 May 2007 17:41:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 17:41:42 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 04 19:41:41 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hk1ml-0005WL-OO for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 May 2007 19:41:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hk1tQ-0000vD-69 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 May 2007 13:48:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hk1tC-0000rD-5N for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2007 13:48:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hk1t9-0000mm-IH for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2007 13:48:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hk1t9-0000mg-Gg for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2007 13:48:15 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hk1mU-0004Ei-4K for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2007 13:41:22 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Hk1mA-0005MV-JH for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2007 19:41:02 +0200 Original-Received: from 207.189.196.61 ([207.189.196.61]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 May 2007 19:41:02 +0200 Original-Received: from tromey by 207.189.196.61 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 May 2007 19:41:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.189.196.61 X-Attribution: Tom User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:vW6UWZCXjwDv92nvI1HWq1fHLL0= X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:43681 Archived-At: >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> Oops. That is fixed in the next release (I'll push it soon). Haha, I found what happened -- I released package.el 0.3 a while ago, but I neglected to upload it to ELPA. How ironic! I've uploaded 0.3 now. The reported bug is fixed there. I haven't yet made it simple to upgrade package.el using itself. I'm considering adding that in a future version. Meanwhile you'll have to download package.el by hand and install it over the old copy. The direct link is: http://tromey.com/elpa/package.el ... but if you haven't yet installed package.el you probably should just use the auto-installer. Tom