From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jesper Harder Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Any hope of being able to redefine C-x without problems??? Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 18:03:32 +0200 Organization: http://purl.org/harder/ Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1064163842 15635 80.91.224.253 (21 Sep 2003 17:04:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 17:04:02 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 21 19:04:00 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A17cu-0006qi-00 for ; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 19:04:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1A17bS-0007hC-1X for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:02:30 -0400 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help X-Face: ^RrvqCr7c,P$zTR:QED"@h9+BTm-"fjZJJ-3=OU7.)i/K]<.J88}s>'Z_$r; List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:12698 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:12698 seberino@spawar.navy.mil (Christian Seberino) writes: > Jesper Harder wrote: > >> Use one of those reserved bindings to avoid conflict with major and >> minor modes. > > There is no way to write some lisp code that makes me able to define > C-x and alter gdb to not have a problem? I thought you could do > anything in elisp? It's possible. But `C-x' is used as prefix by hundreds of basic Emacs functions -- not just gdb. You'll have redefine the bindings for all of them. A lot of tedious work for something which can easily be avoided by using another key-binding which is guaranteed not to conflict with any pre-defined Emacs bindings.