From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jesper Harder Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: show-all-if-ambiguous in emacs? Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 02:24:38 +0200 Organization: http://purl.org/harder/ Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1052526623 12114 80.91.224.249 (10 May 2003 00:30:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 00:30:23 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 10 02:30:11 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19EIFf-0002qp-00 for ; Sat, 10 May 2003 02:30:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19EIFy-00082k-03 for gnu-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 May 2003 20:30:30 -0400 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help X-Face: ^RrvqCr7c,P$zTR:QED"@h9+BTm-"fjZJJ-3=OU7.)i/K]<.J88}s>'Z_$r; List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:9497 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:9497 Jiri Pejchal writes: > I like to set the following variable in my ~/.bashrc to `on': > > `show-all-if-ambiguous' > > This alters the default behavior of the completion functions. If set to > `on', words which have more than one possible completion cause the > matches to be listed immediately instead of ringing the bell. The > default value is `off'. > > Can I get similar behavior with mini-buffer completion? Try `M-x ido-mode'. It doesn't do exactly what you describe, but it's somewhat similar.