From: Jesper Harder <harder@myrealbox.com>
Subject: Does network data really cons strings?
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:41:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m37jzwonei.fsf@defun.localdomain> (raw)
I was a bit surprised to see that network data (or any data received
from processes) conses Lisp strings.
Is it just a quirk of `memory-use-counts' or is it for real? Why does
it need to cons Lisp strings if the data is only inserted in a buffer?
next reply other threads:[~2004-01-12 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-12 21:41 Jesper Harder [this message]
2004-01-12 22:39 ` Does network data really cons strings? Kevin Rodgers
2004-01-13 3:17 ` Jesper Harder
2004-01-13 16:58 ` Kevin Rodgers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m37jzwonei.fsf@defun.localdomain \
--to=harder@myrealbox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).