From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Benjamin Riefenstahl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: accessing own info files Date: 15 Jan 2003 19:39:50 +0100 Organization: None Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87y95qr0ae.fsf@antithese.de> <873cnwwvjl.fsf@antithese.de> <84adi3irge.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1042689698 23549 80.91.224.249 (16 Jan 2003 04:01:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 04:01:38 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18Z1Dl-00067f-00 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 05:01:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18Z1DP-0000PP-00 for gnu-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 23:01:15 -0500 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!gestalt.direcpc.com!telocity-west!DIRECTV!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-01!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!news.supernews.com!cicero.benny.turtle-trading.net!nobody Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Original-Lines: 14 Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:109003 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:5531 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:5531 > Benjamin Riefenstahl writes: > > Yes, if I were a debian user, I would do that. If they have > > reason to provide an alternative, incompatible program for > > installing info files, they should use a different name for it. kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai Großjohann) writes: > Well, Debian was there first. So actually, GNU should have used > another name. Ah, I didn't know that. And yes, I agree. IOW a bug-report to the texinfo maintainer would be in order. Of course a solution would also be to agree on a common implementation ;-).