unofficial mirror of help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: david@adboyd.com (J. David Boyd)
Subject: Re: Is there an emacs security answer vs vim??
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 09:52:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m33b82uwyc.fsf@freewill.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87ac2aa44z.fsf@lion.rapttech.com.au

Tim X <timx@nospam.dev.null> writes:

> david@adboyd.com (J. David Boyd) writes:
>
>> William Case <billlinux@.......com> writes:
>>
>>> Hi;
>>>
>>> I use emacs.  I posed a security question on the Fedora list.  Got some
>>> useful answers but then the thread drifted off to a discussion of vim
>>> -x.  No mention of emacs.  Is there an emacs answer?
>>>
>>> Original question: 
>>> "Need suggestions for a good lockbox -- a specialized application or an
>>> appropriate technique for locking away sensitive personal information.
>>>
>>> I am not normally a paranoid security freak. I keep my single user (and
>>> occasional guests) desktop and Internet system fairly open and loose.
>>> However, I would like to create one secure file or folder in which I can
>>> record as text things like a long list of user names and passwords for
>>> web sites -- to range from minor not often used sites, to Bank Accounts,
>>> paypal, some personal data with serial numbers etc.
>>>
>>> Is there a special program that exists for creating and locking up such
>>> a file without interfering with my generally open way of doing things?
>>> Any recommendations graciously received."
>>>
>>> Vim answer:
>>> "If you want something really simple, there is:
>>> vi -x filename  It will prompt for the encryption key and keep the file
>>> copy encrypted."
>>>
>>> My thread then drifted into a discussion by respondents about vim -x !
>>>
>>> I prefer using emacs, is there a way to use or set up a protected
>>> (encrypted ??) emacs file or directory?
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Regards Bill
>>
>>
>> Hmm, you can try (info "(pgg)").  It uses GPG to provide functions for
>> encryption/decryption.
>>
>
> Note however, pgp is only in emacs 22. 
>
Who would be using anything less? :=>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-29 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-27 18:32 Is there an emacs security answer vs vim?? William Case
2006-11-27 21:22 ` J. David Boyd
     [not found] ` <mailman.1201.1164684357.2155.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2006-11-29 11:22   ` Tim X
2006-11-29 14:52     ` J. David Boyd [this message]
     [not found] <mailman.1179.1164652379.2155.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2006-11-28 19:01 ` Erich Wälde
2006-11-28 21:11   ` Lowell Gilbert
2006-11-29  8:39 ` Tim X

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m33b82uwyc.fsf@freewill.com \
    --to=david@adboyd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).