From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Van L Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is Elisp really that slow? Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 22:09:21 +1000 Message-ID: References: <20190514235412.kncazq45szlum2gr@Ergus> <83v9yb92c7.fsf@gnu.org> <878sv7sp3r.fsf@telefonica.net> <83r28z8zl9.fsf@gnu.org> <20190515210924.sijzy6mnpgzkt4gm@Ergus> <86a7fjnwdq.fsf@zoho.eu> <2ef4d06b-6999-47b5-9daf-5058a1151300@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="234234"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (darwin) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 21 14:09:52 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hT3aZ-000ymA-UL for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 May 2019 14:09:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52504 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hT3aY-0006w1-RS for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 May 2019 08:09:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42520) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hT3aH-0006vj-2n for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 May 2019 08:09:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hT3aG-00079z-7W for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 May 2019 08:09:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=51826 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hT3aG-000786-0g for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 May 2019 08:09:32 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hT3aE-000yPr-2N for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 May 2019 14:09:30 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:gpDyRwoKUxNjKzX/2+BLE/SKvps= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:120566 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: >> When I use a long M-x sequence, a shortcut suggestion appears. It disappears >> before I can catch it. Can it stay for 30 seconds? Can there be an instant >> interactive override to set it whatever you like? > > `C-h v suggest-key-bindings': > > The value can be a length of time to show the message for. > If the value is non-nil and not a number, we wait 2 seconds. > > You can customize this variable. Thank you. I didn't know the sequence to give C-h v. The 1 second wait for which-key's idle feels way longer than the 2 seconds here for this. I guess this is due to the resource load on task focus when you are going from A to B and are surprised by suggest-key-bindings's advertisement. -- © 2019 Van L gpg using EEF2 37E9 3840 0D5D 9183 251E 9830 384E 9683 B835 "Once you get to that elite level, we are all the same." - Pat Farmer