From: Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com>
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: planner or org or ...
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 12:44:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2r6p27aon.fsf@sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87hcpz3q9e.fsf@lion.rapttech.com.au
----- Tim X (2007-05-27) wrote:-----
> So, I think that while the functionality is similar, the underlying
> philosophy is a bit different and they approach things from a
> different perspective re: planning and organising your work. On some
> levels, it is a bit like a comparison of vi and emacs - both can
> achieve the same outcomes, but do it differently and one way suits
> some people while another way suits others. My main bias towards
> planner mode is probably a simple as it being the first mode of this
> type I used under emacs and it has set my expectations.
The difference is: org is the Emacs of organizers. Planner is an
organizer.
org let you create your own way of GTD. Planner creates a way of GTD for
you.
Best,
--
Leo <sdl.web AT gmail.com> (GPG Key: 9283AA3F)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-27 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-26 17:45 planner or org or Rustom Mody
2007-05-26 21:45 ` Xavier Maillard
[not found] ` <mailman.1309.1180216875.32220.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2007-05-27 3:21 ` Tim X
2007-05-27 11:44 ` Leo [this message]
2007-05-27 21:45 ` Xavier Maillard
2007-05-27 22:55 ` Leo
2007-05-28 8:54 ` Xavier Maillard
[not found] ` <mailman.1338.1180303255.32220.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2007-05-28 8:40 ` Tim X
[not found] <mailman.1255.1180153927.32220.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2007-05-26 9:14 ` Tim X
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-26 4:31 Rustom Mody
2007-05-26 4:49 ` Leo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2r6p27aon.fsf@sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk \
--to=sdl.web@gmail.com \
--cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).