From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Van L Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: 1L? Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 21:31:52 +1100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="100166"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (darwin) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 07 11:45:01 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1grhAy-000Prt-8f for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 11:45:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37589 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grhAx-0000s8-7H for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 05:44:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39140) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grgzW-00011k-Hd for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 05:33:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grgzQ-0008I3-Pm for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 05:33:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=34322 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grgzQ-0008Gs-Ie for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 05:33:04 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1grgzO-00091Z-Ae for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 11:33:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:Olicyz+7Yk7/AaAdkhtgaNQCtq4= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:119239 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> I am unfamiliar with the term "1L", and Google wasn't much help. What >> does it mean beyond "one liter"? > I think he meant just that: one liter, i.e. an approximate upper limit > on the size of the machine. I picked it up from the Lenovo brochureware techspecs. Perhaps this capacity measure has origin in watercooling. The specs mention certification for independent software vendors and that I expect means chances are better for Debian and the like to "just work". > Shouldn't *all* "1L machines" run Emacs > just fine? It takes quite a while for gnus to process L117196 on entry to gmane.emacs.help. And, multitasking is impossible while this is busy. A 6core cpu with HT won't make a difference to the 4core without HT in performance, here. > Anyway the RPi, even including the case, should > be way below the 1L constraint The worry is RPi's hobbykit won't cool adequately. The bits and pieces wearout quick, for example, the SD card, &c, &c. -- © 2019 Van L gpg using EEF2 37E9 3840 0D5D 9183 251E 9830 384E 9683 B835 "Where is the letter T?" -Joni Mitchell