* Mac OS X: Rebuild Require after Security Update 2002-11-21
@ 2002-11-23 16:04 Andrew Choi
2002-11-24 6:13 ` Josh DuBois
2002-11-25 4:49 ` Ker Lutyn
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Choi @ 2002-11-23 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
The 2002-11-21 Security Update seems to cause Emacs executables built
before the update to fail. Rebuilding will make them work again. I
realize this is an annoying problem. But I must admit currently I have
no idea how to solve it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Mac OS X: Rebuild Require after Security Update 2002-11-21
2002-11-23 16:04 Mac OS X: Rebuild Require after Security Update 2002-11-21 Andrew Choi
@ 2002-11-24 6:13 ` Josh DuBois
2002-11-24 14:31 ` Hugo Wolf
2002-11-25 4:49 ` Ker Lutyn
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Josh DuBois @ 2002-11-24 6:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
Not suprisingly (given the thread from 11/11/02), rebuilding won't work
for me. I was running 10.2.1 without the security patch unti this
evening: tonigth I installed both.
My 'bootstrap-emacs' fails with a seg. fault (undefined references to
_BC, _PC, and _UP -- all expected from libSystem.B.dylib).
In the prior thread lots of folks seemed to be able to build, but all
the builds I could find posted are broke on my machine now (prob. from
the security patch).
Anyone got a working version built *after* installation of the security
patch that they can post? (or, better yet, know why the build breaks
on some machines?)
Oh, yeah - things are the same whether or not I download totally new,
fresh source from CVS.
Thanks!
Josh.
In article <m2bs4g9srx.fsf@owlbear.local>, Andrew Choi
<akochoi_NOSPAM_@shaw.ca> wrote:
> The 2002-11-21 Security Update seems to cause Emacs executables built
> before the update to fail. Rebuilding will make them work again. I
> realize this is an annoying problem. But I must admit currently I have
> no idea how to solve it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Mac OS X: Rebuild Require after Security Update 2002-11-21
2002-11-24 6:13 ` Josh DuBois
@ 2002-11-24 14:31 ` Hugo Wolf
2002-11-24 18:55 ` Josh DuBois
2002-11-28 17:48 ` Olle Pellijeff
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Hugo Wolf @ 2002-11-24 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
In article <241120020014168166%duboisj@codeweavers.com>, Josh DuBois wrote:
> Anyone got a working version built *after* installation of the security
> patch that they can post?
I have one I can post, but I don't have anywhere to post it. If you
can point me at server I can upload to, I'll do it immediately.
> (or, better yet, know why the build breaks
> on some machines?)
Several possiblities were mentioned in the earlier discussion. Did
you investigate all those?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Mac OS X: Rebuild Require after Security Update 2002-11-21
2002-11-24 14:31 ` Hugo Wolf
@ 2002-11-24 18:55 ` Josh DuBois
2002-11-24 20:15 ` Hugo Wolf
2002-11-28 17:48 ` Olle Pellijeff
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Josh DuBois @ 2002-11-24 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
I wiped all the emacs remnants out of /usr/local and the CVS tip built
after that.
I always have to make one change when I build, though: I have to add
"x-win.el" to the DONTCOMPILE list in lisp/Makefile. I would generate
a patch for this, but
a.) it's trivial, and
b.) I suspect something may be wrong with my build tree, anyway,
because I'm still not getting emacs in a .app wrapper. However, I have
a terminal version that works so I'll live with that for now.
One other note: I had also previously run the disk utility to fix
permissions, although on my machine there only seemed to be one file
with less permissive attributes than it should have had, and that file
was in NetInfo, so I doubt the permissions thing did much for me.
Thanks for the help. I hope the notes above can help someone else
build.
Josh.
In article <op5E9.128899$1O2.9316@sccrnsc04>, Hugo Wolf
<hwolf@deutsches.lieder.net> wrote:
> In article <241120020014168166%duboisj@codeweavers.com>, Josh DuBois wrote:
> > Anyone got a working version built *after* installation of the security
> > patch that they can post?
>
> I have one I can post, but I don't have anywhere to post it. If you
> can point me at server I can upload to, I'll do it immediately.
>
>
> > (or, better yet, know why the build breaks
> > on some machines?)
>
> Several possiblities were mentioned in the earlier discussion. Did
> you investigate all those?
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Mac OS X: Rebuild Require after Security Update 2002-11-21
2002-11-24 18:55 ` Josh DuBois
@ 2002-11-24 20:15 ` Hugo Wolf
2002-11-24 21:29 ` Josh DuBois
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Hugo Wolf @ 2002-11-24 20:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
In article <241120021255059837%duboisj@codeweavers.com>, Josh DuBois wrote:
> I wiped all the emacs remnants out of /usr/local and the CVS tip built
> after that.
I had a feeling that was the source of trouble -- either that or not
doing 'make distclean' first.
> I always have to make one change when I build, though: I have to add
> "x-win.el" to the DONTCOMPILE list in lisp/Makefile. I would generate
> a patch for this, but
> a.) it's trivial, and
> b.) I suspect something may be wrong with my build tree, anyway,
> because I'm still not getting emacs in a .app wrapper.
You shouldn't have to make this change, and you should have an
Emacs.app in the emacs/mac directory. Did you run the configure step
with "--with-carbon"? Last time this came up someone posted their
build steps and they'd omitted this. I pointed it out, but there was
never any further response on the subject.
> However, I have
> a terminal version that works so I'll live with that for now.
Is that really any more useful than Apple's build?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Mac OS X: Rebuild Require after Security Update 2002-11-21
2002-11-24 20:15 ` Hugo Wolf
@ 2002-11-24 21:29 ` Josh DuBois
2002-11-24 22:08 ` Hugo Wolf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Josh DuBois @ 2002-11-24 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
In article <2saE9.129768$QZ.21311@sccrnsc02>, Hugo Wolf
<hwolf@deutsches.lieder.net> wrote:
> I had a feeling that was the source of trouble -- either that or not
> doing 'make distclean' first.
>
I had done a make distclean already, so it seems to have been the stuff
in /usr/local (wouldn't guarantee it, though).
>
> > I always have to make one change when I build, though: I have to add
> > "x-win.el" to the DONTCOMPILE list in lisp/Makefile. I would generate
> > a patch for this, but
> > a.) it's trivial, and
> > b.) I suspect something may be wrong with my build tree, anyway,
> > because I'm still not getting emacs in a .app wrapper.
>
> You shouldn't have to make this change, and you should have an
> Emacs.app in the emacs/mac directory. Did you run the configure step
> with "--with-carbon"? Last time this came up someone posted their
> build steps and they'd omitted this. I pointed it out, but there was
> never any further response on the subject.
>
I specified --with-carbon and --without-x, and I still had to alter the
DONTCOMPILE list. I have no X-windows on this machine: do most people
build with X installed?
>
> Is that really any more useful than Apple's build?
>
No, it's not ;-(. What I really want is a nice LaTeX mode. I've got
to go away from my internet connection now, but perhaps I'll try to
investigate more when I can.
Cheers.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Mac OS X: Rebuild Require after Security Update 2002-11-21
2002-11-24 21:29 ` Josh DuBois
@ 2002-11-24 22:08 ` Hugo Wolf
2002-11-25 8:11 ` Josh DuBois
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Hugo Wolf @ 2002-11-24 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
In article <241120021529133550%duboisj@codeweavers.com>, Josh DuBois wrote:
> I specified --with-carbon and --without-x, and I still had to alter the
> DONTCOMPILE list.
Very strange. Sounds like it's trying to compile something
Windows-specific and therefore failing, but I don't understand why
these configuration options would lead to that result.
> I have no X-windows on this machine: do most people
> build with X installed?
I don't know about most people, but I've had XFree installed pretty
much as long as I've been running osx. I have plenty of occasions to
run xemacs remotely on my Mac. Otoh for these purposes it shouldn't
matter one way or the other if you configure emacs --without-x (as I
do).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Mac OS X: Rebuild Require after Security Update 2002-11-21
2002-11-23 16:04 Mac OS X: Rebuild Require after Security Update 2002-11-21 Andrew Choi
2002-11-24 6:13 ` Josh DuBois
@ 2002-11-25 4:49 ` Ker Lutyn
2002-11-25 5:02 ` Andrew Choi
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ker Lutyn @ 2002-11-25 4:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
> Rebuilding will make them work again.
I, too, have been unable to build emacs from the sources:
$ cvs update
$ make distclean
$ ./configure --with-carbon --without-x
$ make bootstrap
[...]
Recursive `require' for feature `help-fns'
make[1]: *** [bootstrap-emacs] Error 255
make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
Can anyone help me here? Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Mac OS X: Rebuild Require after Security Update 2002-11-21
2002-11-25 4:49 ` Ker Lutyn
@ 2002-11-25 5:02 ` Andrew Choi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Choi @ 2002-11-25 5:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
ker527mail@yahoo.com (Ker Lutyn) writes:
> > Rebuilding will make them work again.
>
> I, too, have been unable to build emacs from the sources:
>
> $ cvs update
> $ make distclean
> $ ./configure --with-carbon --without-x
> $ make bootstrap
> [...]
> Recursive `require' for feature `help-fns'
> make[1]: *** [bootstrap-emacs] Error 255
> make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
>
> Can anyone help me here? Thanks!
This is from the News section of my web page.
November 24, 2002
The CVS seems broken for bootstrapping again. Please try an earlier
version (yesterday's) or try doing this after updating to the latest
version before running `make bootstrap':
cvs update -r 1.272 lisp/faces.el
cvs update -r 1.29 lisp/cus-face.el
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Mac OS X: Rebuild Require after Security Update 2002-11-21
2002-11-24 22:08 ` Hugo Wolf
@ 2002-11-25 8:11 ` Josh DuBois
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Josh DuBois @ 2002-11-25 8:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
In <Y5cE9.101227$%m4.47751@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net> Hugo Wolf wrote:
Well, in case anyone else is having the same difficulty, my problem was
that I had a completely innapropriate build system (I'm running OS 10.2.
2 but had the devtools from 10.1 installed).
Now that installed the correct developer tools from apple's web-site cvs
compiles out of the box (except for the current, temporary problem with
faces.el & cus-face.el), with no modification to exclude x-win.el, and I
get an Emacs.app wrapper.
Thanks for all the help - hope I didn't add too much confusion to the
list.
Cheers -
Josh.
In article <241120021529133550%duboisj@codeweavers.com>, Josh DuBois
> wrote:
>> I specified --with-carbon and --without-x, and I still had to alter
>> the DONTCOMPILE list. > Very strange. Sounds like it's trying to
>> compile something
> Windows-specific and therefore failing, but I don't understand why
> these configuration options would lead to that result.
>
>
>
>> I have no X-windows on this machine: do most people
>> build with X installed?
>
> I don't know about most people, but I've had XFree installed pretty
> much as long as I've been running osx. I have plenty of occasions to
> run xemacs remotely on my Mac. Otoh for these purposes it shouldn't
> matter one way or the other if you configure emacs --without-x (as I
> do).
>
>
>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Mac OS X: Rebuild Require after Security Update 2002-11-21
2002-11-24 14:31 ` Hugo Wolf
2002-11-24 18:55 ` Josh DuBois
@ 2002-11-28 17:48 ` Olle Pellijeff
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Olle Pellijeff @ 2002-11-28 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
In <op5E9.128899$1O2.9316@sccrnsc04> Hugo Wolf wrote:
> In article <241120020014168166%duboisj@codeweavers.com>, Josh DuBois
> wrote:
>> Anyone got a working version built *after* installation of the
>> security patch that they can post?
>
> I have one I can post, but I don't have anywhere to post it. If you
> can point me at server I can upload to, I'll do it immediately.
I've been saved twice now by http://www.porkrind.org/emacs/
by David Caldwell who's put up dmg packages after the 12.2.2 and
now the security patch upgrades.
Thank's David!
>
>
>> (or, better yet, know why the build breaks
>> on some machines?)
>
> Several possiblities were mentioned in the earlier discussion. Did
> you investigate all those?
>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-11-28 17:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-11-23 16:04 Mac OS X: Rebuild Require after Security Update 2002-11-21 Andrew Choi
2002-11-24 6:13 ` Josh DuBois
2002-11-24 14:31 ` Hugo Wolf
2002-11-24 18:55 ` Josh DuBois
2002-11-24 20:15 ` Hugo Wolf
2002-11-24 21:29 ` Josh DuBois
2002-11-24 22:08 ` Hugo Wolf
2002-11-25 8:11 ` Josh DuBois
2002-11-28 17:48 ` Olle Pellijeff
2002-11-25 4:49 ` Ker Lutyn
2002-11-25 5:02 ` Andrew Choi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).