From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Van L Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Why is Elisp slow? Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 13:15:07 +1000 Message-ID: References: <83muk4obfd.fsf@gnu.org> <20190502214006.4fdsinp7u5xuqvdv@Ergus> <20190503004416.xfuzzucflp6bxpuz@Ergus> <20190503103644.63lccjehmzulaojn@Ergus> <456EE4D4-F542-4F6A-B146-E6B9D72AE93B@icloud.com> <83tvebn1we.fsf@gnu.org> <20190503125832.44ovncaxp3vyjsla@Ergus> <20190504133218.g3ysx3ksuyvlthg3@Ergus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="26748"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (darwin) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 10 05:16:50 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hOw1h-0006p1-Nt for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 05:16:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36032 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOw1g-0000lZ-L0 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 23:16:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46838) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOw1W-0000lT-2M for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 23:16:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOw1U-0004jl-TL for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 23:16:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=49046 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOw1U-0004jK-MB for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2019 23:16:36 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hOw1T-0006YI-4R for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 05:16:35 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:yGKi87u3Kdki3KrNQK4hbVlrfag= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:120276 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > Guile would hopefully win on some of those, but by how much? > >>8 [snip] >>8 [snip] >> because we need manpower. > >8 [snip] > > But last I checked Guile didn't have much manpower either. And there's > a good chance that tracking Guile development (after switching to Guile) > will also require manpower on Emacs's side. Can a big advance in funding boost womanpower participation in making programming and testing great again? recently, big companies that shal go nameless have been fined amounts like $USD5B, $USD30B plus, and another one is enqueued for a $USD5B wet lettuce slap across the wrist. What if the FSF (1) is given a percentage of those fines? say 2%, to spray on the next evolution of the Internet's GNU Emacs with GC once every two weeks. (1) https://nlnet.nl/NGI/reports/NGI-Study-ISBN-9789279864667.pdf -- © 2019 Van L gpg using EEF2 37E9 3840 0D5D 9183 251E 9830 384E 9683 B835 "The pH of lemon juice is 2." - EdX SPU27.1x