From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Van L Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Why is Elisp slow? Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 15:14:53 +1000 Message-ID: References: <20190503103644.63lccjehmzulaojn@Ergus> <456EE4D4-F542-4F6A-B146-E6B9D72AE93B@icloud.com> <83tvebn1we.fsf@gnu.org> <20190503125832.44ovncaxp3vyjsla@Ergus> <20190504133218.g3ysx3ksuyvlthg3@Ergus> <831BD780-F954-4E23-BF31-ED4E135C919B@icloud.com> <20190506125848.okei2qrib7m5p3vx@Ergus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="261396"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (darwin) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 10 07:15:19 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hOxsN-0015rl-HJ for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 07:15:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37034 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOxsM-0006Nl-Gc for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 01:15:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33249) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOxs8-0006NJ-2x for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 01:15:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOxs7-0000B3-1s for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 01:15:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=36014 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hOxs6-0000AU-Rk for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 01:15:03 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hOxs4-0015Vg-IV for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 07:15:00 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:SX67XaORwE1TCCnnjAiIxIJUVUs= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:120280 Archived-At: > Yes, it's a very different design. Elisp was designed to be the > *implementation* language of Emacs (the use of C for some of the > implementation was a necessary evil given the lack of wide availability > of Lisp), rather than just an *extension* language. Is it possible to drop the C and re-introduce the missing microcodes from the Lisp Machine for the full lispy experience on a CuBox Pulse? (1) (1) https://www.solid-run.com/nxp-family/cubox-pulse/ -- © 2019 Van L gpg using EEF2 37E9 3840 0D5D 9183 251E 9830 384E 9683 B835 "The pH of lemon juice is 2." - EdX SPU27.1x