From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien?= Le Callonnec Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Interacting with minibuffer Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 19:45:55 +0100 Message-ID: Reply-To: sebastien@weblogism.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28394"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.5.13; emacs 28.0.50 To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 22 21:02:59 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lkWtn-0007Fb-Ku for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 22 May 2021 21:02:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53622 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lkWtl-0005AG-Pf for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 22 May 2021 15:02:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52080) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lkWt1-00058I-Mk for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 May 2021 15:02:11 -0400 Original-Received: from 4.mo2.mail-out.ovh.net ([87.98.172.75]:42950) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lkWsy-0002yA-Ld for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 May 2021 15:02:11 -0400 Original-Received: from player799.ha.ovh.net (unknown [10.108.20.96]) by mo2.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292032084FF for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 21:01:55 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from weblogism.com (unknown [109.78.85.125]) (Authenticated sender: sebastien@weblogism.com) by player799.ha.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8A4FB1E62069F for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 19:01:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass (GARM-97G002db0d70a4-3d5c-498c-9681-8a0ba0c29e88, 47D6CD134FE0CD759D6770202AB2AA214392A3E5) smtp.auth=sebastien@weblogism.com X-OVh-ClientIp: 109.78.85.125 X-Organisation: Coucou Wahlou X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 6134747118265865430 X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdejhedgudefgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjpdevjffgvefmvefgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucehtddtnecunecujfgurhepfgfhvffuffhrkfggtgfgsehtqhertddtreejnecuhfhrohhmpefurogsrghsthhivghnucfnvgcuvegrlhhlohhnnhgvtgcuoehsvggsrghsthhivghnseifvggslhhoghhishhmrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefftdeiueegtefgveeuvdehtddvffeufeehhfeiffdvgfdtgeevtddvgffhfeevgeenucfkpheptddrtddrtddrtddpuddtledrjeekrdekhedruddvheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdqohhuthdphhgvlhhopehplhgrhigvrhejleelrdhhrgdrohhvhhdrnhgvthdpihhnvghtpedtrddtrddtrddtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepshgvsggrshhtihgvnhesfigvsghlohhgihhsmhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehhvghlphdqghhnuhdqvghmrggtshesghhnuhdrohhrgh Received-SPF: none client-ip=87.98.172.75; envelope-from=sebastien@weblogism.com; helo=4.mo2.mail-out.ovh.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:130077 Archived-At: Hi all, I use emacs built on the master branch. The new behaviour of minibuffer keeps tripping me, to the point where I feel like I am fighting with it, an= d end up going into an M-g frenzy. Those are typically difficult to reproduce, but I found an example where I am at a loss as to what I am supposed to do to get the right behaviour. Let's say I have a buffer open, and I want to do a `search-forward' with a string already in my kill ring, so C-s, I get into the minibuffer, C-y, and it turns out that the string is not present in the buffer. At that point my reflex is to try to edit the search string: arrow keys end up moving the cursor in the buffer, and the command disappears from the minibuffer; backspace deletes the whole search string. Note that if the search is successful, backspace does behave as expected. Is there something I am missing in the configuration of minibuffer to avoid this? Thanks in advance, S=C3=A9bastien.