From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: IDE versus emacs Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <83d30y87yi.fsf@gnu.org> <83626q7zvk.fsf@gnu.org> <87y5jl243r.fsf@gmail.com> <87pq4xbqup.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87d30xatgo.fsf@wanadoo.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1349448915 9715 80.91.229.3 (5 Oct 2012 14:55:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:55:15 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 05 16:55:19 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TK9J9-0005a6-3J for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 16:55:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35482 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TK9J3-0006tK-80 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 10:55:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34929) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TK9Iq-0006n6-QC for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 10:55:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TK9Ip-00037c-Ip for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 10:55:00 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:58618) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TK9Ip-00037U-C2 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 10:54:59 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TK9It-0005Ru-Bk for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 16:55:03 +0200 Original-Received: from 94-21-242-229.pool.digikabel.hu ([94.21.242.229]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 16:55:03 +0200 Original-Received: from adatgyujto by 94-21-242-229.pool.digikabel.hu with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 16:55:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 94.21.242.229 (Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.1; U; IBM EVV/3.0/EAK01AG9/LE; en) Presto/2.10.289 Version/12.02) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:87086 Archived-At: Óscar Fuentes wanadoo.es> writes: > > Emacs has partial support for some of those features, with CEDET always > shining on the horizon, but instead of catching up with other IDEs as > time passes, it is falling behind. > The Eclipse developers should be persuaded somehow to separate the completion/refactoring stuff into a separate library. Is there a reason why this part is tied to their GUI editor? If it were a separate library then any editor could use it, not just Eclipse.