Re: emacs on android again

Re: emacs on android again

[Subhan Tindall]

This is a known issue with no existing solution.
Try using the smallest font size available then working your way up.
See
https://github.com/zielmicha/emacs-android/issues/2
for discussion & a possible workaround


On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:12 AM, B. T. Raven <btraven@nihil.net> wrote:
> I downloaded and installed emacs installer from PlayStore onto Galaxy S 4G
> (rooted gingerbread) and tried to use the autobuild process but got:
>
> Fatal error (11) Segmentation fault
> /data/data/com.zielm.emacs $
>
> Looks like I was ejected to a bash shell. From the letter of 1-13 on this group
> it looks like someone at least has gotten a little further than this. After all
> this SD memory is still at 11GB and system memory at 315MB. Does any of you have
> any suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ed
>



-- 
Subhan Michael Tindall | Software Developer
| smt@rentrakmail.com
RENTRAK | www.rentrak.com | NASDAQ: RENT

Re: emacs on android again

[B. T. Raven]

<mailman.18796.1359737697.855.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>Subhan TindallFri, 1 Feb
2013 08:15:55 -0800

Thanks, Subhan. I noticed that there was a copy of vi on the galaxy after
rooting it. I guess I could use that until emacs is fixed. ;-)

>
>This is a known issue with no existing solution.
>Try using the smallest font size available then working your way up.
>See
>https://github.com/zielmicha/emacs-android/issues/2
>for discussion & a possible workaround
>
>
>On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:12 AM, B. T. Raven <btraven@nihil.net> wrote:
>> I downloaded and installed emacs installer from PlayStore onto Galaxy S 4G
>> (rooted gingerbread) and tried to use the autobuild process but got:
>>
>> Fatal error (11) Segmentation fault
>> /data/data/com.zielm.emacs $
>>
>>Looks like I was ejected to a bash shell. From the letter of 1-13 on this group
>>it looks like someone at least has gotten a little further than this. After all
>>this SD memory is still at 11GB and system memory at 315MB. Does any of you have
>> any suggestions?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ed
>>
>
>
>