From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: [OFFPTOPIC] ACM digital library Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 08:42:43 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87lf3aeasj.fsf_-_@zoho.eu> <87ilyb237u.fsf@zoho.eu> <87pmsjzhay.fsf@zoho.eu> <20211006070643.GB20835@tuxteam.de> <20211006125405.GA32757@tuxteam.de> <20211006205640.GA16037@tuxteam.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26081"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: tomas@tuxteam.de, help-gnu-emacs To: Yuri Khan Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 07 14:43:44 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mYSkS-0006XQ-2z for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 14:43:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40242 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYSkQ-0007kk-VP for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 08:43:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49462) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYSjc-0007hC-ET for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 08:42:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:60313) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYSjZ-0006Oj-SD for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 08:42:51 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BFA658050D; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 08:42:45 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 174FB80323; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 08:42:44 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1633610564; bh=64op5wqBRzfRUqEyZDthvYewTfpcyKpjGFp0FJMoUC0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Q18tW4gQq8dHqDjc11leHfSinLRJ1FOnkEhfOPZmcJQ3UOft6epdvwSE1XUFXM4C1 TSB5WjIyCPe1upAGalka1JAZSZBJuy63rwoHXe/N7lbK3Rge1yVYK68zg23p4Q09CL xYCpjHx8PWtbqnYnO8n+YEVpVeiuS9WOd0sjMv4xGVcc15wEXy33MI/8FM+7AscYlq B55F46Yb/KgKD8F4Fp3r5uhi153F74l6jGxIb/tIgvApO2Hgep4vrxFILk6HDMGy5i RZ44j+ICaE6r+0cfGeGeWJz+TBL7oFPxLv4xoEPX6V1w4PuTklKzEcavuDbKa1t+ZU rwZ5Oz9wWsVDw== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.241.23]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D78F6120273; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 08:42:43 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Yuri Khan's message of "Thu, 7 Oct 2021 13:29:14 +0700") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:133642 Archived-At: >> I didn't imply it was. I think it's just a case of "cultural hegemony". >> Or something. > > You mean you=E2=80=99d prefer if their cookie warning looked more like Ar= tLebedev=E2=80=99s? > > We are using cookies on all our websites including this one > because without cookies the entire Internet would go to shit. > > [ Fine ] > > (Blame the legislators for the necessity to warn about cookies at all. > Cookies as designed are just a way for the web server to correlate > your two sequential requests to each other, including letting you stay > logged in for more than a single request.) In the current discussion there is no need to correlate two sequential requests (e.g. noone is logged in). Stefan