From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: can a command specify overwrite selection behavior? Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 21:46:19 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <33ac6984-0a0c-4db8-8ea1-50ec5c271a25@x18g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <05a87fbb-31a7-40c3-a890-6c7aacaefac3@t5g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <92235e12-464c-41d9-9a49-33598c157113@i25g2000prd.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1293507660 14570 80.91.229.12 (28 Dec 2010 03:41:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 03:41:00 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 28 04:40:55 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PXQQh-0004FQ-AC for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 04:40:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56228 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PXQQg-0000dZ-Ox for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 22:40:54 -0500 Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!194.109.133.84.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 10 Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="vVLY7BbminM2r0OBdDtBhQ"; logging-data="9784"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+hR9qX8pfWmIkC+nmrsmnL" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:lGPX5vnz+xGT9m8aHQAnUukSDSU= sha1:6WQINJw+qD70jfW1V7IkhdaMDSw= Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:183695 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:77925 Archived-At: > This behavior is _by design_. No, it's because of the implementation: a pre-command-hook. That's one of the reasons why I wanted the shift-select code not to rely on this-command and things like that, but be triggered by explicit code in the interactive spec. Stefan