From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Screenshots, frame shots straight from Emacs Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 16:05:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87sg1dgbbk.fsf@omarpolo.com> <87pmwhg843.fsf@omarpolo.com> <8735t96mxj.fsf@omarpolo.com> <87pmw961ox.fsf@zoho.eu> <874kcpxln9.fsf@logand.com> <87pmvcdgqg.fsf@t14.reltub.ca> <87a6mgwz17.fsf@logand.com> <87tukno4s8.fsf@t14.reltub.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39961"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Stefan Monnier via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor To: Leo Butler Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 21 22:20:40 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m6Ihq-000A6k-Bd for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 22:20:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47746 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m6Ihp-0006U9-As for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 16:20:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37712) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m6ITi-0005lD-U4 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 16:06:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:32803) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m6ITg-0000zV-6f for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 16:06:01 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 58795100221; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 16:05:57 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 053C71000F8; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 16:05:56 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1626897956; bh=7CkUglpJTX5B8IQN0LTFk3IJLAFh/s2wcPEKs42bmM8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=i/SrRs7jx7vOV68y7IhBTcWlRqVrswwBLJmrl9JW/si/gDu9LHAkcH78FwBorIm+x ZI90gaTGPblW+TUqXwb18ZGFho05LAfhqWWfBXH9+NMNLeEE0buoTAMMMip09icc+P Fk6aLDZj/kvmprJC2jJcEbUOqk3V4LnaG7frmD+ju41EGuEppY8Pa4FyK1EU68li0C vpshL9gA3L94p4EBEEzoerqWvDmMk/5CHM1oYmh7gYb5gReteFRUhjRlA3583p0nvn fg7jCl1eaakiqQNLJIn3NALmzBRaEs7BzOT2eRZLhDVxvgXinidvxWiz4E9J4CQcui BQgXVGbu4b3aQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.29.138]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB82C120257; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 16:05:55 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87tukno4s8.fsf@t14.reltub.ca> (Leo Butler's message of "Wed, 21 Jul 2021 14:17:27 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:131975 Archived-At: >> They provide the same features but under different names (i.e. the >> above change should generally come with other changes to adjust to the >> different names; they seemed to be missing from the patch). > > The byte compiler did not complain after making the change. I didn't > investigate further, but suspect that the requirement is unneeded. Quite likely (unless it so happens that the package relies on one of those `cl` features which were incorporated into core when `cl-lib` was introduced, the main such feature being `setf`). Stefan