From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: How to avoid compiler warning `unused lexical variable' for `dolist' or `dotimes'? Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:03:55 -0500 Message-ID: References: <868s92ntez.fsf@x201.butler.org> <86zh1hn21c.fsf@x201.butler.org> <86r1mrmy86.fsf@x201.butler.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5170"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Leo Butler Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 11 16:12:14 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kyyre-0001EN-8f for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:12:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44674 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyyrd-0004mU-BA for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:12:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45746) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyyjl-0003rK-HB for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:04:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:37345) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyyjh-0001jb-2k for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:04:04 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0E256101AA5; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:03:59 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3DEC1100216; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:03:57 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1610377437; bh=IOp3AYZsqziXQxwo5cTlHJiLwflHUxV2EZOD6DzXPKc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=hxXfnCJRLa6YVkaxOmI7RjKzJ4msXFHDiHZNxESdx3xQqBb7WpLOcdy+dwx2WhNF+ Ne7JctdsfJT6+tnQ1Tt7rLC3kQMhcQLRqy5eNK1ipULf6yD48S++LfEpSJjJsu9qH8 ocEHDF4fp8VJWhzKAaXTI7x00qeXo4SlV5Cuk9hTzn9PatMiRekkMuvxN7fJmM4rRP eD3b/4mkHnhE9P6opXBZKv3oX21mWlM3ElbIcgsQnmPhkw8b7nRkAsW0zRF2nWtOyA K/oAtSIQBvsC9RZOsR8hT8pIGEgS5sA48/qwsjq2NNwTdZWH+zmg5g8xreeD/z7XjT rSEDKOqNZZDxw== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.72.224.181]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F08511203D5; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:03:56 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <86r1mrmy86.fsf@x201.butler.org> (Leo Butler's message of "Mon, 11 Jan 2021 06:53:13 -0600") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:127190 Archived-At: > I realize that elisp does not claim to be a dialect of common lisp, but > it would be helpful to note that this behaviour deviates from the > behaviour of several CL implementations (gcl, clisp, sbcl, ecl). Yes, I know ;-) I opted for the semantics which I consider cleaner. Stefan