From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is add-to-list supposed to work when lexical-binding is t? Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 03:56:51 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1370828639.61556.YahooMailClassic@web141105.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1370851036 26373 80.91.229.3 (10 Jun 2013 07:57:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 07:57:16 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 10 09:57:16 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ulwya-0004Bu-2h for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:57:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50097 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UlwyZ-0004kk-Q1 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 03:57:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33604) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UlwyO-0004ke-1G for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 03:57:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UlwyM-0005Uh-R8 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 03:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:56678) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UlwyM-0005UT-Kb for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 03:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UlwyL-000423-Ho for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:57:01 +0200 Original-Received: from 69-165-139-76.dsl.teksavvy.com ([69.165.139.76]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:57:01 +0200 Original-Received: from monnier by 69-165-139-76.dsl.teksavvy.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:57:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 69-165-139-76.dsl.teksavvy.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:rFRJvwTVA0AcAboQO2LxoYEaoJM= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:91429 Archived-At: > I don't see cases where quote-var would fail to do what's intended. We can have gv-ref/quote-var/quote-lex/younameit, but what we can't do is merge it with quote, because their semantics are incompatible: (eq (let ((x 1)) (quote-var x)) (let ((x 1)) (quote-var x))) should return nil, whereas (eq (let ((x 1)) (quote x)) (let ((x 1)) (quote x))) should return t. Stefan