From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Major mode for coq Date: Sun, 05 May 2024 15:59:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87le4o5h5f.fsf@posteo.net> <6V91vZx9E12exnax-3iPbiFgAwFLIb8p6YbteC5R8Rq4hBA3BAfDFF6liGpHG57cKTSy7CnUqvL1Lr-KVhv4TdaQF88Lx-kujL5GRnj2eLc=@protonmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="652"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Philip Kaludercic , help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Heime Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 05 21:59:49 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1s3i1U-000AWv-I0 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 May 2024 21:59:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3i14-0004EG-J9; Sun, 05 May 2024 15:59:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3i12-0004Dd-OT for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2024 15:59:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s3i10-000421-OX for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2024 15:59:20 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 58DE5100061; Sun, 5 May 2024 15:59:17 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1714939156; bh=mHTsKNVPZ4RPJkx6415UrAeRzAtmmkfW1UY8v1Bk32g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Zgk9nox6c1bVlWTc4MxoMOOHN9cl5elYcyw9ee7+8smKyNekJbq+EHP/H4Oi1umzH laGaMlzL/4V5x2LImODROvbG/uWJQEmdqE2e9rxUp5p8zECyrVaVNc76rrnayt8ze9 uo692y7zwmGh1N1lV/hwmSdupyZo9/yXX3kMHw73PeCnnftlIfF+0/FH2ot4woRnbZ q/Bykym8wFFZsuIhRdFpi6Dmi29yPo2nOs/pfty1gefSQ2B+Xs6H00TzKINO69C66Y KyHRiscuncDeDJ4A8EC6LW1kbjKXQzO9e89ExVsa1w/k/HHIy1LL0MgtezxAmBhQOX HPZxCVEZ/Bmuw== Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5C62A100035; Sun, 5 May 2024 15:59:16 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.72.201.215]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2FAB5120500; Sun, 5 May 2024 15:59:16 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <6V91vZx9E12exnax-3iPbiFgAwFLIb8p6YbteC5R8Rq4hBA3BAfDFF6liGpHG57cKTSy7CnUqvL1Lr-KVhv4TdaQF88Lx-kujL5GRnj2eLc=@protonmail.com> (Heime's message of "Sun, 05 May 2024 19:08:54 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:146574 Archived-At: > Currently I have an old machine with an old system that I cannot install > coq in it, but I still want to view and change the files like normal .el, > .c, and the like. I have not followed Proof-General closely enough to be sure, but in the past, opening a Coq file did not launch a `coq` process (only subsequent PG commands would do so), so that should work fine. If not, file a bug report against Proof-General. Stefan